
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 5600M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌260% higher power demand at 180W vs 50W.
Radeon Pro 5600M
2020Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 180W, a 130W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Radeon Pro 5600M
2020Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 180W, a 130W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌260% higher power demand at 180W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than Radeon Pro 5600M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Pro 5600M make more sense than GeForce GTX 1060?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 55 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 41 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 37 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 19 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 31 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 420 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 336 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 280 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 210 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 315 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 210 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 105 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 183 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 55 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Radeon Pro 5600M

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon Pro 5600M
Radeon Pro 5600M
The Radeon Pro 5600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 15 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,324 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Radeon Pro 5600M's 9,324 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 7.9%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro 5600M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2,560 (Radeon Pro 5600M). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 5.274 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5600M). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1030 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064+8% | 9,324 |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+68% | 5.274 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+68% | 1030 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160 | 160 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 5600M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 5600M has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro 5600M offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro 5600M) — the Radeon Pro 5600M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5600M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5600M). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5600M).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Radeon Pro 5600M's 50W — a 113% difference. The Radeon Pro 5600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 500W (Radeon Pro 5600M). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 50W-72% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-20% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 90°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 186.5+234% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 5600M is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | — |
| Codename | GP104 | Navi 12 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | June 15 2020 |
| Ranking | #137 | #283 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













