
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 5700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $550 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 181.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 14.4 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 267mm, a 94mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,064 vs 11,469).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌38.5% higher power demand at 180W vs 130W.
Radeon Pro 5700
2020Why buy it
- ✅+14% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 180W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌220.9% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.4 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌54.3% longer card at 267mm vs 173mm.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Radeon Pro 5700
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $550 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 181.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 14.4 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 267mm, a 94mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅+14% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 180W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,064 vs 11,469).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌38.5% higher power demand at 180W vs 130W.
Trade-offs
- ❌220.9% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.4 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌54.3% longer card at 267mm vs 173mm.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro 5700 better than GeForce GTX 1060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 56 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 27 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 180 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 38 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 516 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 413 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 344 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 258 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 387 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 310 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 194 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 129 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 378 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 325 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 275 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 216 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 301 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 262 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 95 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Radeon Pro 5700

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon Pro 5700
Radeon Pro 5700
The Radeon Pro 5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,469 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Radeon Pro 5700's 11,469 — the Radeon Pro 5700 leads by 14%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro 5700 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro 5700). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 6.221 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5700). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1350 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064 | 11,469+14% |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+11% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+43% | 6.221 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+28% | 1350 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160+11% | 144 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 5700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 5700 has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro 5700 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro 5700) — the Radeon Pro 5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5700). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5700). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro 5700).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Radeon Pro 5700's 130W — a 32.3% difference. The Radeon Pro 5700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 500W (Radeon Pro 5700). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 130W-28% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-20% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 88.2+58% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro 5700 launched at $799. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 68.8% less ($550 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 14.4 (Radeon Pro 5700) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 180.6% better value. The Radeon Pro 5700 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-69% | $799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+181% | 14.4 |
| Codename | GP104 | Navi 10 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | August 4 2020 |
| Ranking | #137 | #238 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













