
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro Duo
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅11.6% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,250 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 630% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 5.5 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 350W, a 170W reduction.
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 240mm, a 67mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Radeon Pro Duo
2016Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌502% HIGHER MSRP$1,499 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.5 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌94.4% higher power demand at 350W vs 180W.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Radeon Pro Duo
2016Why buy it
- ✅11.6% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,250 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 630% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 5.5 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 350W, a 170W reduction.
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 240mm, a 67mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌502% HIGHER MSRP$1,499 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.5 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌94.4% higher power demand at 350W vs 180W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than Radeon Pro Duo?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro Duo still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro Duo |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 97 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 37 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 22 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro Duo |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 243 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 175 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 52 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro Duo |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 299 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 249 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 187 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 280 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 140 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 93 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro Duo |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 237 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 142 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 160 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 55 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Radeon Pro Duo

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon Pro Duo
Radeon Pro Duo
The Radeon Pro Duo is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 4096 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 350W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,299 points. Launch price was $1,499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Radeon Pro Duo's 8,299 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 21.3%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro Duo uses GCN 3.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro Duo). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 8.192 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro Duo). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro Duo |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064+21% | 8,299 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 4096 ×2+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+8% | 8.192 TFLOPS ×2 |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+73% | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 ×2 |
| TMUs | 160 | 256 ×2+60% |
| L1 Cache | 0.94 MB | 1 MB+6% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro Duo relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro Duo |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Duo has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro Duo offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro Duo |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro Duo). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro Duo |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro Duo). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro Duo).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro Duo |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Radeon Pro Duo's 350W — a 64.2% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 500W (Radeon Pro Duo). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro Duo |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-49% | 350W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-20% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9+136% | 23.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro Duo launched at $1499. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 83.4% less ($1250 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 5.5 (Radeon Pro Duo) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 634.5% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro Duo |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-83% | $1499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+635% | 5.5 |
| Codename | GP104 | Capsaicin |
| Release | May 27 2016 | April 26 2016 |
| Ranking | #137 | #309 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













