
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro SSG
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $6,750 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $6,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2478.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $6,999 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 260W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 267mm, a 94mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro SSG across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Radeon Pro SSG
2016Why buy it
- ✅2.1% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌2710.8% HIGHER MSRP$6,999 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.6 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($6,999 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 260W vs 180W.
- ❌54.3% longer card at 267mm vs 173mm.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Radeon Pro SSG
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $6,750 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $6,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2478.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $6,999 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 260W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 267mm, a 94mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅2.1% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro SSG across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌2710.8% HIGHER MSRP$6,999 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.6 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($6,999 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 260W vs 180W.
- ❌54.3% longer card at 267mm vs 173mm.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro SSG better than GeForce GTX 1060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 1060 make more sense than Radeon Pro SSG?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro SSG |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 121 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 37 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 22 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro SSG |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 235 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 204 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 121 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 95 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 50 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro SSG |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 494 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 395 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 247 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 370 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 296 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 247 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 185 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 247 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 197 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 123 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro SSG |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 243 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 143 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 56 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Radeon Pro SSG

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon Pro SSG
Radeon Pro SSG
The Radeon Pro SSG is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 26 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,972 points. Launch price was $9,999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Radeon Pro SSG's 10,972 — the Radeon Pro SSG leads by 9%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro SSG uses GCN 3.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro SSG). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro SSG). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1050 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro SSG |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064 | 10,972+9% |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 4096+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+3% | 8.602 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+65% | 1050 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160 | 256+60% |
| L1 Cache | 0.94 MB | 1 MB+6% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro SSG relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro SSG |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro SSG has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro SSG offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro SSG) — the Radeon Pro SSG has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro SSG |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro SSG). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro SSG |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro SSG). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro SSG).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro SSG |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Radeon Pro SSG's 260W — a 36.4% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 500W (Radeon Pro SSG). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro SSG |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-31% | 260W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-20% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9+32% | 42.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro SSG launched at $6999. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 96.4% less ($6750 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1.6 (Radeon Pro SSG) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 2425% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro SSG |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-96% | $6999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+2425% | 1.6 |
| Codename | GP104 | Fiji |
| Release | May 27 2016 | July 26 2016 |
| Ranking | #137 | #249 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













