GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon Pro Vega 64X

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

2016Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz
GTX family
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro Vega 64X

2019Core: 1250 MHzBoost: 1468 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon Pro Vega 64X Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon Pro Vega 64X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon Pro Vega 64X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

  • 6.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $1,951 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $2,200 MSRP).
  • Delivers 565.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $2,200 MSRP).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs Unknown).
  • Radeon Pro Vega 64X is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so GeForce GTX 1060 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,064 vs 13,369).
  • 2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Radeon Pro Vega 64X

2019

Why buy it

  • +32.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • More future proof: GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2019 hardware with Unknown of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 783.5% HIGHER MSRP
    $2,200 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.1 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($2,200 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 1060 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 6.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon Pro Vega 64X instead at 13,369 vs 10,064, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1060 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1060 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,951 cheaper on MSRP at $249 vs $2,200, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 565.1% (40.4 vs 6.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon Pro Vega 64X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

AMD

Radeon Pro Vega 64X

The Radeon Pro Vega 64X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 19 2019. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1250 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,369 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Radeon Pro Vega 64X's 13,369 — the Radeon Pro Vega 64X leads by 32.8%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro Vega 64X uses GCN 5.0, both on 16 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.03 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1468 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon Pro Vega 64X
G3D Mark Score
10,064
13,369+33%
Architecture
Pascal
GCN 5.0
Process Node
16 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
2560
4096+60%
Compute (TFLOPS)
8.873 TFLOPS
12.03 TFLOPS+36%
Boost Clock
1733 MHz+18%
1468 MHz
ROPs
64
64
TMUs
160
256+60%
L1 Cache
0.94 MB
1 MB+6%
L2 Cache
2 MB
4 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro Vega 64X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 64X carries 0 MB. GeForce GTX 1060 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1060 and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro Vega 64X. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) — the Radeon Pro Vega 64X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon Pro Vega 64X
VRAM Capacity
6 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
192-bit+50%
128-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB
4 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon Pro Vega 64X
DirectX
12
12.1
Vulkan
1.3+18%
1.1
OpenGL
4.5
4.6+2%
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Encoder
NVENC (Pascal)
VCE 4.0
Decoder
NVDEC (Pascal)
UVD 7.0
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 64X's 250W — a 32.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 64X). Power connectors: 6-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 173mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon Pro Vega 64X
TDP
180W-28%
250W
Recommended PSU
400W
1W-100%
Power Connector
6-pin
Integrated
Length
173mm
0mm
Height
111mm
0mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
55.9+4%
53.5
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1060 came in at $249, while the Radeon Pro Vega 64X launched at $2200. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1060 was 88.7% cheaper ($1951 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 6.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 64X) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 562.3% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro Vega 64X (2019 vs 2016).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon Pro Vega 64X
MSRP
$249-89%
$2200
Performance per Dollar
40.4+562%
6.1
Codename
GP104
Vega 10
Release
May 27 2016
March 19 2019
Ranking
#137
#190

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.