
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro W5500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅+12.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 80.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 22.3 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 241mm, a 68mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌44% higher power demand at 180W vs 125W.
Radeon Pro W5500
2020Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 180W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,913 vs 10,064).
- ❌60.2% HIGHER MSRP$399 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 22.3 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌39.3% longer card at 241mm vs 173mm.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Radeon Pro W5500
2020Why buy it
- ✅+12.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 80.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 22.3 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 241mm, a 68mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 180W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌44% higher power demand at 180W vs 125W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,913 vs 10,064).
- ❌60.2% HIGHER MSRP$399 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 22.3 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌39.3% longer card at 241mm vs 173mm.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than Radeon Pro W5500?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Pro W5500 make more sense than GeForce GTX 1060?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 97 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 41 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 37 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 20 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 52 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 19 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 401 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 267 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 201 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 301 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 241 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 150 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 160 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 100 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 196 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 162 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 47 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Radeon Pro W5500

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon Pro W5500
Radeon Pro W5500
The Radeon Pro W5500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1187 MHz to 1400 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,913 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Radeon Pro W5500's 8,913 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 12.9%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro W5500 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1,408 (Radeon Pro W5500). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 3.942 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5500). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1400 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064+13% | 8,913 |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+82% | 1408 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+125% | 3.942 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+24% | 1400 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 160+82% | 88 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro W5500 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro W5500 has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro W5500 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro W5500). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5500). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs HEVC,H.264,VP9 (Radeon Pro W5500).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | HEVC,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Radeon Pro W5500's 125W — a 36.1% difference. The Radeon Pro W5500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 500W (Radeon Pro W5500). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 125W-31% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-20% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 71.3+28% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro W5500 launched at $399. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 37.6% less ($150 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 22.3 (Radeon Pro W5500) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 81.2% better value. The Radeon Pro W5500 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-38% | $399 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+81% | 22.3 |
| Codename | GP104 | Navi 14 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | February 10 2020 |
| Ranking | #137 | #294 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













