
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro W5700X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $750 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 129.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 17.6 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 305mm, a 132mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro W5700X across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Radeon Pro W5700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅9.3% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌301.2% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.6 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌76.3% longer card at 305mm vs 173mm.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Radeon Pro W5700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $750 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 129.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 17.6 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 305mm, a 132mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅9.3% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro W5700X across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌301.2% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.6 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌76.3% longer card at 305mm vs 173mm.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro W5700X better than GeForce GTX 1060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 182 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 115 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 66 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 254 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 42 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 778 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 624 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 528 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 396 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 594 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 396 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 297 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 396 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 314 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 249 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 198 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 390 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 341 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 292 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 234 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 316 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 226 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 197 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 182 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 125 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Radeon Pro W5700X

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon Pro W5700X
Radeon Pro W5700X
The Radeon Pro W5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 11 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 2040 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 205W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,591 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Radeon Pro W5700X's 17,591 — the Radeon Pro W5700X leads by 74.8%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro W5700X uses RDNA 1.0, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro W5700X). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 9.4 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5700X). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 2040 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064 | 17,591+75% |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+11% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS | 9.4 TFLOPS+6% |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | 2040 MHz+18% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160+11% | 144 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro W5700X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro W5700X has 16 GB. The Radeon Pro W5700X offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro W5700X) — the Radeon Pro W5700X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 16 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5700X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5700X). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs HEVC,H.264 (Radeon Pro W5700X).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | HEVC,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Radeon Pro W5700X's 205W — a 13% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 650W (Radeon Pro W5700X). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 305mm, occupying 2 vs 4 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-12% | 205W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-38% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | 305mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2-50% | 4 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 85.8+53% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro W5700X launched at $999. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 75.1% less ($750 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 17.6 (Radeon Pro W5700X) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 129.5% better value. The Radeon Pro W5700X is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro W5700X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-75% | $999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+130% | 17.6 |
| Codename | GP104 | Navi 10 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | December 11 2019 |
| Ranking | #137 | #130 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













