GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon PRO W6400

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

2016Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon PRO W6400

2022Core: 2331 MHzBoost: 2331 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

  • +19.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • 50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

  • Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
  • 260% higher power demand at 180W vs 50W.

Radeon PRO W6400

2022

Why buy it

  • Costs $20 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
  • More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
  • Draws 50W instead of 180W, a 130W reduction.
  • Measures 168mm instead of 173mm, a 5mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,428 vs 10,064).
  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than Radeon PRO W6400?
Yes. GeForce GTX 1060 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 10,064 vs 8,428 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce GTX 1060 is a 2016 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Radeon PRO W6400 is a 2022 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon PRO W6400 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2022 generation instead of 2016, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 6nm process instead of 16nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
GeForce GTX 1060 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce GTX 1060 is about 8.7% more expensive on MSRP at $249 MSRP versus $229 MSRP, and you are getting 19.4% higher G3D Mark. Radeon PRO W6400 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
When does Radeon PRO W6400 make more sense than GeForce GTX 1060?
Yes. Radeon PRO W6400 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (50W vs 180W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $229 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce GTX 1060. The trade-off is that GeForce GTX 1060 currently gives you 19.4% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 9.8%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce GTX 1060Radeon PRO W6400
1080p
low117 FPS107 FPS
medium105 FPS95 FPS
high91 FPS81 FPS
ultra77 FPS67 FPS
1440p
low103 FPS95 FPS
medium87 FPS80 FPS
high76 FPS67 FPS
ultra67 FPS56 FPS
4K
low55 FPS45 FPS
medium49 FPS42 FPS
high41 FPS31 FPS
ultra37 FPS28 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce GTX 1060Radeon PRO W6400
1080p
low216 FPS165 FPS
medium181 FPS130 FPS
high148 FPS97 FPS
ultra113 FPS63 FPS
1440p
low134 FPS108 FPS
medium107 FPS85 FPS
high87 FPS64 FPS
ultra68 FPS45 FPS
4K
low62 FPS56 FPS
medium51 FPS44 FPS
high49 FPS35 FPS
ultra41 FPS22 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce GTX 1060Radeon PRO W6400
1080p
low453 FPS333 FPS
medium362 FPS292 FPS
high302 FPS212 FPS
ultra226 FPS173 FPS
1440p
low340 FPS235 FPS
medium272 FPS211 FPS
high226 FPS158 FPS
ultra170 FPS123 FPS
4K
low226 FPS137 FPS
medium181 FPS124 FPS
high151 FPS85 FPS
ultra113 FPS56 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce GTX 1060Radeon PRO W6400
1080p
low358 FPS285 FPS
medium302 FPS206 FPS
high260 FPS180 FPS
ultra226 FPS146 FPS
1440p
low299 FPS210 FPS
medium254 FPS149 FPS
high208 FPS132 FPS
ultra170 FPS104 FPS
4K
low170 FPS105 FPS
medium133 FPS76 FPS
high123 FPS67 FPS
ultra102 FPS51 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Radeon PRO W6400

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

AMD

Radeon PRO W6400

The Radeon PRO W6400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2331 MHz to 2331 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,428 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Radeon PRO W6400's 8,428 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 19.4%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Radeon PRO W6400 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 768 (Radeon PRO W6400). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 3.58 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6400). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 2331 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon PRO W6400
G3D Mark Score
10,064+19%
8,428
Architecture
Pascal
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
16 nm
6 nm
Shading Units
2560+233%
768
Compute (TFLOPS)
8.873 TFLOPS+148%
3.58 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1733 MHz
2331 MHz+35%
ROPs
64+100%
32
TMUs
160+233%
48
L1 Cache
960 KB+275%
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W6400 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon PRO W6400
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W6400 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1 MB (Radeon PRO W6400) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon PRO W6400
VRAM Capacity
6 GB+50%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
192-bit
256-bit+33%
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6400). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon PRO W6400
DirectX
12
12.2+2%
Vulkan
1.3+8%
1.2
OpenGL
4.5
4.6+2%
Max Displays
4+100%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6400). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon PRO W6400).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon PRO W6400
Encoder
NVENC (Pascal)
VCN 3.0
Decoder
NVDEC (Pascal)
VCN 3.0
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Radeon PRO W6400's 50W — a 113% difference. The Radeon PRO W6400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W6400). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon PRO W6400
TDP
180W
50W-72%
Recommended PSU
400W-20%
500W
Power Connector
6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
173mm
168mm
Height
111mm
69mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
55.9
168.6+202%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W6400 launched at $229. The Radeon PRO W6400 costs 8% less ($20 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 36.8 (Radeon PRO W6400) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 9.8% better value. The Radeon PRO W6400 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2016).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon PRO W6400
MSRP
$249
$229-8%
Performance per Dollar
40.4+10%
36.8
Codename
GP104
Navi 24
Release
May 27 2016
January 19 2022
Ranking
#137
#308