
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W6600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $400 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 75.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 23.0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 190mm, a 17mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W6600 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌80% higher power demand at 180W vs 100W.
Radeon PRO W6600
2021Why buy it
- ✅24.4% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 180W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌160.6% HIGHER MSRP$649 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 23.0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Radeon PRO W6600
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $400 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 75.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 23.0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 190mm, a 17mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅24.4% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 180W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W6600 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌80% higher power demand at 180W vs 100W.
Trade-offs
- ❌160.6% HIGHER MSRP$649 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 23.0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon PRO W6600 better than GeForce GTX 1060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon PRO W6600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 113 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 51 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon PRO W6600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 387 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 313 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 239 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 185 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 231 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 60 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon PRO W6600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 666 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 529 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 445 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 336 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 495 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 252 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 336 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 269 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 224 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 168 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon PRO W6600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 623 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 518 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 448 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 336 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 472 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 387 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 325 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 252 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 298 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 268 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 224 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 168 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Radeon PRO W6600

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon PRO W6600
Radeon PRO W6600
The Radeon PRO W6600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2331 MHz to 2903 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,932 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Radeon PRO W6600's 14,932 — the Radeon PRO W6600 leads by 48.4%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Radeon PRO W6600 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1,792 (Radeon PRO W6600). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 10.4 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6600). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 2903 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon PRO W6600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064 | 14,932+48% |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+43% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS | 10.4 TFLOPS+17% |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | 2903 MHz+68% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160+43% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+88% | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W6600 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon PRO W6600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W6600 has 8 GB. The Radeon PRO W6600 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon PRO W6600) — a 16.7% advantage for the Radeon PRO W6600. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon PRO W6600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 224 GB/s+17% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6600). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon PRO W6600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6600). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon PRO W6600).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon PRO W6600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Radeon PRO W6600's 100W — a 57.1% difference. The Radeon PRO W6600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W6600). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 190mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon PRO W6600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 100W-44% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-20% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | 190mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 149.3+167% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W6600 launched at $649. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 61.6% less ($400 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 23.0 (Radeon PRO W6600) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 75.7% better value. The Radeon PRO W6600 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon PRO W6600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-62% | $649 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+76% | 23.0 |
| Codename | GP104 | Navi 23 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | June 8 2021 |
| Ranking | #137 | #153 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













