
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W6600X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $450 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 115.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 18.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 241mm, a 68mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,064 vs 13,113).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌50% higher power demand at 180W vs 120W.
Radeon PRO W6600X
2021Why buy it
- ✅+30.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 180W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌180.7% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.8 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌39.3% longer card at 241mm vs 173mm.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Radeon PRO W6600X
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $450 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 115.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 18.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 241mm, a 68mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅+30.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 180W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,064 vs 13,113).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌50% higher power demand at 180W vs 120W.
Trade-offs
- ❌180.7% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.8 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌39.3% longer card at 241mm vs 173mm.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon PRO W6600X better than GeForce GTX 1060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 50 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 356 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 291 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 222 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 178 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 179 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 113 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 56 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 590 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 472 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 393 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 295 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 443 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 354 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 221 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 295 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 148 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 590 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 472 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 393 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 295 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 443 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 354 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 221 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 148 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Radeon PRO W6600X

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon PRO W6600X
Radeon PRO W6600X
The Radeon PRO W6600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2068 MHz to 2479 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,113 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Radeon PRO W6600X's 13,113 — the Radeon PRO W6600X leads by 30.3%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Radeon PRO W6600X uses RDNA 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2,048 (Radeon PRO W6600X). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 10.15 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6600X). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 2479 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064 | 13,113+30% |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+25% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS | 10.15 TFLOPS+14% |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | 2479 MHz+43% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160+25% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+88% | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W6600X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W6600X has 8 GB. The Radeon PRO W6600X offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon PRO W6600X) — a 16.7% advantage for the Radeon PRO W6600X. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 224 GB/s+17% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6600X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6600X). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W6600X).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Radeon PRO W6600X's 120W — a 40% difference. The Radeon PRO W6600X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W6600X). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 120W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-20% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 109.3+96% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W6600X launched at $699. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 64.4% less ($450 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 18.8 (Radeon PRO W6600X) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 114.9% better value. The Radeon PRO W6600X is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-64% | $699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+115% | 18.8 |
| Codename | GP104 | Navi 23 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | August 3 2021 |
| Ranking | #137 | #197 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













