GeForce GTX 1060
Radeon Pro W6900X
GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon Pro W6900X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon Pro W6900X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon Pro W6900X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,751 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1292.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 300W, a 120W reduction.
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 267mm, a 94mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro W6900X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Radeon Pro W6900X
2021Why buy it
- ✅78.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅433.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2309.6% HIGHER MSRP$6,000 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.9 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($6,000 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 300W vs 180W.
- ❌54.3% longer card at 267mm vs 173mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon Pro W6900X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.
Radeon Pro W6900X
The Radeon Pro W6900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2150 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,413 points. Launch price was $4,999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Radeon Pro W6900X's 17,413 — the Radeon Pro W6900X leads by 73%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro W6900X uses RDNA 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 5,120 (Radeon Pro W6900X). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 22.02 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W6900X). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 2150 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro W6900X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064 | 17,413+73% |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 5120+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS | 22.02 TFLOPS+148% |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | 2150 MHz+24% |
| ROPs | 64 | 128+100% |
| TMUs | 160 | 320+100% |
| L1 Cache | 0.94 MB | 1 MB+6% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro W6900X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro W6900X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro W6900X carries 32 GB. Radeon Pro W6900X gives you 433.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1060 and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro W6900X. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro W6900X) — the Radeon Pro W6900X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro W6900X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 32 GB+433% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.2 (Radeon Pro W6900X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro W6900X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon Pro W6900X). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro W6900X).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro W6900X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Radeon Pro W6900X's 300W — a 50% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 650W (Radeon Pro W6900X). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 4 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro W6900X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-40% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-38% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 120mm |
| Slots | 2-50% | 4 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 58.0+4% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 1060 came in at $249, while the Radeon Pro W6900X launched at $6000. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1060 was 95.9% cheaper ($5751 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2.9 (Radeon Pro W6900X) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 1293.1% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro W6900X (2021 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro W6900X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-96% | $6000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+1293% | 2.9 |
| Codename | GP104 | Navi 21 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | August 3 2021 |
| Ranking | #137 | #101 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 1060 and Radeon Pro W6900X
