
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W7600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $350 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 47.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 27.5 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 240mm, a 67mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,064 vs 16,443).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌38.5% higher power demand at 180W vs 130W.
Radeon PRO W7600
2023Why buy it
- ✅+63.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 180W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌140.6% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 27.5 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌38.7% longer card at 240mm vs 173mm.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Radeon PRO W7600
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $350 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 47.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 27.5 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 240mm, a 67mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅+63.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 180W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,064 vs 16,443).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌38.5% higher power demand at 180W vs 130W.
Trade-offs
- ❌140.6% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 27.5 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌38.7% longer card at 240mm vs 173mm.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon PRO W7600 better than GeForce GTX 1060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 49 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 26 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 31 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 740 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 592 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 493 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 370 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 555 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 444 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 370 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 370 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 296 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 247 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 185 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 244 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 210 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 54 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Radeon PRO W7600

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon PRO W7600
Radeon PRO W7600
The Radeon PRO W7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2440 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,443 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Radeon PRO W7600's 16,443 — the Radeon PRO W7600 leads by 63.4%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Radeon PRO W7600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 16 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2,048 (Radeon PRO W7600). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 2440 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064 | 16,443+63% |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+25% | 2048 |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | 2440 MHz+41% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160+25% | 128 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W7600 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7600 has 8 GB. The Radeon PRO W7600 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7600) — a 16.7% advantage for the Radeon PRO W7600. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 224 GB/s+17% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7600). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7600). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7600).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Radeon PRO W7600's 130W — a 32.3% difference. The Radeon PRO W7600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 650W (Radeon PRO W7600). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 130W-28% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-38% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 126.5+126% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W7600 launched at $599. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 58.4% less ($350 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 27.5 (Radeon PRO W7600) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 46.9% better value. The Radeon PRO W7600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-58% | $599 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+47% | 27.5 |
| Codename | GP104 | Navi 33 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | August 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #137 | #123 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













