G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

✅+280.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Delivers 358.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 8.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro WX 4150: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro WX 4150 is already obsolete for modern gaming.

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌260% higher power demand at 180W vs 50W.

Radeon Pro WX 4150

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 50W instead of 180W, a 130W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,642 vs 10,064).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
20.5% HIGHER MSRP
$300 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.8 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Radeon Pro WX 4150

2017

Why buy it

✅+280.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Delivers 358.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 8.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro WX 4150: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro WX 4150 is already obsolete for modern gaming.

Why buy it

✅Draws 50W instead of 180W, a 130W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌260% higher power demand at 180W vs 50W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,642 vs 10,064).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
20.5% HIGHER MSRP
$300 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.8 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than Radeon Pro WX 4150?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1060 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 10,064 vs 2,642 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce GTX 1060 is a 2016 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Radeon Pro WX 4150 is a 2017 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1060 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 280.9% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 6 GB instead of 4 GB, and the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce GTX 1060 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce GTX 1060 is about $51 cheaper on MSRP at $249 MSRP versus $300 MSRP, and you are getting 280.9% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 358.9%. Radeon Pro WX 4150 is the newer 2017 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture and lower power draw (50W vs 180W) than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Radeon Pro WX 4150 make more sense than GeForce GTX 1060?

Yes. Radeon Pro WX 4150 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (50W vs 180W), and staying closer to $300 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce GTX 1060. The trade-off is that GeForce GTX 1060 currently gives you 280.9% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 358.9%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1060 Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro WX 4150 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon Pro WX 4150
1080p
low	117 FPS	50 FPS
medium	105 FPS	33 FPS
high	91 FPS	23 FPS
ultra	77 FPS	11 FPS
1440p
low	103 FPS	34 FPS
medium	87 FPS	21 FPS
high	76 FPS	11 FPS
ultra	67 FPS	6 FPS
4K
low	55 FPS	11 FPS
medium	49 FPS	7 FPS
high	41 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	3 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open Radeon Pro WX 4150

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon Pro WX 4150
1080p
low	216 FPS	72 FPS
medium	181 FPS	43 FPS
high	148 FPS	30 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	18 FPS
1440p
low	134 FPS	35 FPS
medium	107 FPS	22 FPS
high	87 FPS	14 FPS
ultra	68 FPS	10 FPS
4K
low	62 FPS	10 FPS
medium	51 FPS	7 FPS
high	49 FPS	5 FPS
ultra	41 FPS	4 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open Radeon Pro WX 4150

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon Pro WX 4150
1080p
low	453 FPS	119 FPS
medium	362 FPS	95 FPS
high	302 FPS	79 FPS
ultra	226 FPS	59 FPS
1440p
low	340 FPS	89 FPS
medium	272 FPS	71 FPS
high	226 FPS	59 FPS
ultra	170 FPS	45 FPS
4K
low	226 FPS	59 FPS
medium	181 FPS	48 FPS
high	151 FPS	40 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	30 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open Radeon Pro WX 4150

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon Pro WX 4150
1080p
low	358 FPS	119 FPS
medium	302 FPS	95 FPS
high	260 FPS	79 FPS
ultra	226 FPS	59 FPS
1440p
low	299 FPS	89 FPS
medium	254 FPS	71 FPS
high	208 FPS	59 FPS
ultra	170 FPS	45 FPS
4K
low	170 FPS	59 FPS
medium	133 FPS	48 FPS
high	123 FPS	40 FPS
ultra	102 FPS	30 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open Radeon Pro WX 4150

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Radeon Pro WX 4150

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon Pro WX 4150

The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1002 MHz to 1053 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,642 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Radeon Pro WX 4150's 2,642 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 280.9%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro WX 4150 uses GCN 4.0, both on 16 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 896 (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1.887 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1053 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon Pro WX 4150
G3D Mark Score	10,064+281%	2,642
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 4.0
Process Node	16 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	2560+186%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.873 TFLOPS+370%	1.887 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1733 MHz+65%	1053 MHz
ROPs	64+300%	16
TMUs	160+186%	56
L1 Cache	960 KB+329%	224 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon Pro WX 4150
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 4150 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX 4150) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon Pro WX 4150
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+50%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	192-bit+200%	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon Pro WX 4150
DirectX	12	12 (12_0)
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.5	4.6+2%
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Radeon Pro WX 4150).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon Pro WX 4150
Encoder	NVENC (Pascal)	VCE 3.4 (Polaris)
Decoder	NVDEC (Pascal)	UVD 6.3
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC	H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Radeon Pro WX 4150's 50W — a 113% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4150). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon Pro WX 4150
TDP	180W	50W-72%
Recommended PSU	400W	350W-13%
Power Connector	6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	173mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	—	75°C
Perf/Watt	55.9+6%	52.8

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro WX 4150 launched at $300. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 17% less ($51 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 8.8 (Radeon Pro WX 4150) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 359.1% better value. The Radeon Pro WX 4150 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).