
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro WX 5100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅50.5% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $250 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 266.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 11.0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro WX 5100: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro WX 5100 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌140% higher power demand at 180W vs 75W.
Radeon Pro WX 5100
2016Why buy it
- ✅31.8% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 180W, a 105W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌100.4% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Radeon Pro WX 5100
2016Why buy it
- ✅50.5% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $250 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 266.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 11.0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro WX 5100: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro WX 5100 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Why buy it
- ✅31.8% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 180W, a 105W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌140% higher power demand at 180W vs 75W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌100.4% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than Radeon Pro WX 5100?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro WX 5100 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro WX 5100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 47 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro WX 5100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 41 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 18 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro WX 5100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 124 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 62 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro WX 5100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 124 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 97 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 48 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Radeon Pro WX 5100

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon Pro WX 5100
Radeon Pro WX 5100
The Radeon Pro WX 5100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 18 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 713 MHz to 1086 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Radeon Pro WX 5100's 5,500 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 83%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro WX 5100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 16 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1,792 (Radeon Pro WX 5100). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 3.892 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 5100). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1086 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro WX 5100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064+83% | 5,500 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+43% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+128% | 3.892 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+60% | 1086 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 160+43% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+114% | 448 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro WX 5100 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro WX 5100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 5100 has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 5100 offers 31.8% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro WX 5100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 7.906 GB+32% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 5100). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro WX 5100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 5100). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 5100).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro WX 5100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Radeon Pro WX 5100's 75W — a 82.4% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 5100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 5100). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 173mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro WX 5100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 75W-58% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 350W-13% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | 173mm |
| Height | 111mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 82°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 73.3+31% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro WX 5100 launched at $499. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 50.1% less ($250 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 11.0 (Radeon Pro WX 5100) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 267.3% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon Pro WX 5100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-50% | $499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+267% | 11.0 |
| Codename | GP104 | Ellesmere |
| Release | May 27 2016 | November 18 2016 |
| Ranking | #137 | #416 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













