GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon R7 260X

CPU

GPU

GeForce GTX 1060

2016Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz

GTX family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Radeon R7 260X

2013Boost: 1000 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon R7 260X Performance Spectrum

GeForce GTX 1060

6 GB 180

10,064

+214.7%

GeForce GTX 680

GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE

GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

GeForce GTX TITAN Z

GeForce GTX 980 Ti

GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile

GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

Radeon R7 260X

2 GB 115

3,198

0.0%

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon R7 260X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon R7 260X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

✅261.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 75.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 23.0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $139 MSRP).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Radeon R7 260X is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1060 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌56.5% higher power demand at 180W vs 115W.

Radeon R7 260X

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $110 less on MSRP ($139 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
✅Draws 115W instead of 180W, a 65W reduction.
✅Measures 170mm instead of 173mm, a 3mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 23.0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($139 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 1060 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 261.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 214.7% in PassMark G3D (10,064 vs 3,198), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1060 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, a 16nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2016 generation instead of 2013. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1060 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $110 more expensive on MSRP at $249 vs $139, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 75.7% (40.4 vs 23.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon R7 260X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon R7 260X

The Radeon R7 260X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,198 points. Launch price was $139.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Radeon R7 260X's 3,198 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 214.7%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Radeon R7 260X uses GCN 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 896 (Radeon R7 260X). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1.971 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 260X). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon R7 260X
G3D Mark Score	10,064+215%	3,198
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 2.0
Process Node	16 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2560+186%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.873 TFLOPS+350%	1.971 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1733 MHz+73%	1000 MHz
ROPs	64+300%	16
TMUs	160+186%	56
L1 Cache	960 KB+329%	224 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R7 260X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon R7 260X
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 260X carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 1060 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 104 GB/s (Radeon R7 260X) — a 84.6% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1060. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1060 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 260X. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 260X) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon R7 260X
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+200%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	192 GB/s+85%	104 GB/s
Bus Width	192-bit+50%	128-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R7 260X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon R7 260X
DirectX	12	12 (12_0)
Vulkan	1.3+8%	1.2
OpenGL	4.5	4.6+2%
Max Displays	4	6+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 260X). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R7 260X).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon R7 260X
Encoder	NVENC (Pascal)	VCE 2.0
Decoder	NVDEC (Pascal)	UVD 4.2
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Radeon R7 260X's 115W — a 44.1% difference. The Radeon R7 260X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 500W (Radeon R7 260X). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 173mm vs 170mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon R7 260X
TDP	180W	115W-36%
Recommended PSU	400W-20%	500W
Power Connector	6-pin	1x 6-pin
Length	173mm	170mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	—	80
Perf/Watt	55.9+101%	27.8

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1060 came in at $249, while the Radeon R7 260X launched at $139. On MSRP, Radeon R7 260X was 44.2% cheaper ($110 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 23.0 (Radeon R7 260X) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 75.7% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1060 (2016 vs 2013).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon R7 260X
MSRP	$249	$139-44%
Performance per Dollar	40.4+76%	23.0
Codename	GP104	Bonaire
Release	May 27 2016	October 8 2013
Ranking	#137	#568

Search GeForce GTX 1060 on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 260X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.