G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

✅1242.7% more average FPS across 43 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 464.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 7.2 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon R7 A365: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon R7 A365 is already obsolete for modern gaming.

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌500% higher power demand at 180W vs 30W.

Radeon R7 A365

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $140 less on MSRP ($109 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
✅Draws 30W instead of 180W, a 150W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 43 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.2 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Radeon R7 A365

2014

Why buy it

✅1242.7% more average FPS across 43 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 464.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 7.2 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon R7 A365: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon R7 A365 is already obsolete for modern gaming.

Why buy it

✅Costs $140 less on MSRP ($109 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
✅Draws 30W instead of 180W, a 150W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌500% higher power demand at 180W vs 30W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 43 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.2 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than Radeon R7 A365?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1060 is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce GTX 1060 averages 1242.7% more FPS across 43 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 10,064 vs 781 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce GTX 1060 is a 2016 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Radeon R7 A365 is a 2014 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1060 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2016 generation instead of 2014, 1188.6% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 6 GB instead of 512 MB, and the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce GTX 1060 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce GTX 1060 is about 128.4% more expensive on MSRP at $249 MSRP versus $109 MSRP, and you are getting 1242.7% more estimated average FPS across 43 tracked games in our benchmark data and 1188.6% higher G3D Mark. Radeon R7 A365 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is Radeon R7 A365 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. Radeon R7 A365 is 2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM, 781 in G3D Mark, and FSR upscaling. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1060 Benchmark Check

Radeon R7 A365 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon R7 A365
1080p
low	117 FPS	13 FPS
medium	105 FPS	8 FPS
high	91 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	77 FPS	3 FPS
1440p
low	103 FPS	7 FPS
medium	87 FPS	4 FPS
high	76 FPS	2 FPS
ultra	67 FPS	1 FPS
4K
low	55 FPS	3 FPS
medium	49 FPS	2 FPS
high	41 FPS	1 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	1 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open Radeon R7 A365

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon R7 A365
1080p
low	216 FPS	35 FPS
medium	181 FPS	20 FPS
high	148 FPS	14 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	10 FPS
1440p
low	134 FPS	12 FPS
medium	107 FPS	6 FPS
high	87 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	68 FPS	4 FPS
4K
low	62 FPS	3 FPS
medium	51 FPS	2 FPS
high	49 FPS	2 FPS
ultra	41 FPS	1 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open Radeon R7 A365

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon R7 A365
1080p
low	453 FPS	35 FPS
medium	362 FPS	28 FPS
high	302 FPS	23 FPS
ultra	226 FPS	18 FPS
1440p
low	340 FPS	26 FPS
medium	272 FPS	21 FPS
high	226 FPS	18 FPS
ultra	170 FPS	13 FPS
4K
low	226 FPS	18 FPS
medium	181 FPS	14 FPS
high	151 FPS	12 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	9 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open Radeon R7 A365

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon R7 A365
1080p
low	358 FPS	35 FPS
medium	302 FPS	28 FPS
high	260 FPS	18 FPS
ultra	226 FPS	12 FPS
1440p
low	299 FPS	4 FPS
medium	254 FPS	3 FPS
high	208 FPS	3 FPS
ultra	170 FPS	2 FPS
4K
low	170 FPS	3 FPS
medium	133 FPS	2 FPS
high	123 FPS	2 FPS
ultra	102 FPS	1 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open Radeon R7 A365

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Radeon R7 A365

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon R7 A365

The Radeon R7 A365 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 781 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Radeon R7 A365's 781 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 1188.6%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Radeon R7 A365 uses GCN 1.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 384 (Radeon R7 A365). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 0.6336 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A365). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 825 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon R7 A365
G3D Mark Score	10,064+1189%	781
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 1.0
Process Node	16 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2560+567%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.873 TFLOPS+1300%	0.6336 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1733 MHz+110%	825 MHz
ROPs	64+700%	8
TMUs	160+567%	24
L1 Cache	960 KB+900%	96 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R7 A365 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon R7 A365
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 A365 has 512 MB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 1100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 A365) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon R7 A365
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+1100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	192 GB/s	Unknown
Bus Width	192-bit+50%	128-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12 (FL 12_0) (Radeon R7 A365). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon R7 A365
DirectX	12	12 (FL 12_0)
Vulkan	1.3+8%	1.2
OpenGL	4.5	4.6+2%
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R7 A365). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs H.264,HEVC,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R7 A365).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon R7 A365
Encoder	NVENC (Pascal)	VCE 3.0
Decoder	NVDEC (Pascal)	UVD 6.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC	H.264,HEVC,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Radeon R7 A365's 30W — a 142.9% difference. The Radeon R7 A365 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A365). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon R7 A365
TDP	180W	30W-83%
Recommended PSU	400W	350W-13%
Power Connector	6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	173mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Perf/Watt	55.9+115%	26.0

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon R7 A365 launched at $109. The Radeon R7 A365 costs 56.2% less ($140 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 7.2 (Radeon R7 A365) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 461.1% better value. The GeForce GTX 1060 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2014).