
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

Radeon R7 M445
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅+962.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 967% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 3.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon R7 M445: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon R7 M445 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1100% higher power demand at 180W vs 15W.
Radeon R7 M445
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 180W, a 165W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (947 vs 10,064).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌0.4% HIGHER MSRP$250 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.8 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Radeon R7 M445
2016Why buy it
- ✅+962.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 967% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 3.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon R7 M445: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon R7 M445 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 180W, a 165W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1100% higher power demand at 180W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (947 vs 10,064).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌0.4% HIGHER MSRP$250 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.8 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than Radeon R7 M445?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R7 M445 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R7 M445 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 13 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 5 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 3 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 9 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 5 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 1 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R7 M445 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 10 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 7 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 8 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 3 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 1 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 1 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R7 M445 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 21 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 32 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 16 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 21 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 11 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R7 M445 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 19 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 6 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 5 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 3 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 2 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Radeon R7 M445

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon R7 M445
Radeon R7 M445
The Radeon R7 M445 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 920 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 947 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Radeon R7 M445's 947 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 962.7%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Radeon R7 M445 uses GCN 3.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 320 (Radeon R7 M445). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 0.5888 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M445). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 920 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R7 M445 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064+963% | 947 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+700% | 320 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+1407% | 0.5888 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+88% | 920 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+700% | 8 |
| TMUs | 160+700% | 20 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+1100% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+1438% | 0.13 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R7 M445 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R7 M445 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M445 has 512 MB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 1100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 0.13 MB (Radeon R7 M445) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R7 M445 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+1100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+1438% | 0.13 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Radeon R7 M445's 15W — a 169.2% difference. The Radeon R7 M445 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M445). Power connectors: 6-pin vs Mobile.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R7 M445 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 15W-92% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 350W-13% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 173mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 63.1+13% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon R7 M445 launched at $250. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 0.4% less ($1 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 3.8 (Radeon R7 M445) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 963.2% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R7 M445 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | $250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+963% | 3.8 |
| Codename | GP104 | Meso |
| Release | May 27 2016 | May 15 2016 |
| Ranking | #137 | #899 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













