
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅+1500% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 664.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 5.3 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $119 MSRP).
- ✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 300W, a 120W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $130 less on MSRP ($119 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (629 vs 10,064).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.3 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($119 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 300W vs 180W.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B
2025Why buy it
- ✅+1500% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 664.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 5.3 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $119 MSRP).
- ✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 300W, a 120W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $130 less on MSRP ($119 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (629 vs 10,064).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.3 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($119 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 300W vs 180W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B make more sense than GeForce GTX 1060?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 21 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 11 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 14 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 11 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 7 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 21 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 11 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 14 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 11 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 7 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 21 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 11 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 14 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 11 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 7 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 21 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 11 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 14 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 11 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 7 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B
The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the Bristol Ridge architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 629 points. Launch price was $1,299.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B's 629 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 1500%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B uses Bristol Ridge, both on 16 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 4,096 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 2920 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064+1500% | 629 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Bristol Ridge |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 4096+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS | 47.84 TFLOPS+439% |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | 2920 MHz+68% |
| ROPs | 64 | 128+100% |
| TMUs | 160 | 256+60% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 8 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B has 512 MB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 1100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 8 MB (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B) — the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+1100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 8 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B's 300W — a 50% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-40% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 350W-13% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9+2562% | 2.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B launched at $119. The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B costs 52.2% less ($130 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 5.3 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 662.3% better value. The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | $119-52% |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+662% | 5.3 |
| Codename | GP104 | Navi 48 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | July 23 2025 |
| Ranking | #137 | #23 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













