GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon R9 280

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

2016Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 280

2014Boost: 933 MHz

GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon R9 280 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon R9 280 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon R9 280: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

  • βœ…81.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • βœ…Costs $30 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
  • βœ…Delivers 103.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 19.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
  • βœ…100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 3 GB).
  • βœ…Radeon R9 280 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1060 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Radeon R9 280

2014

Why buy it

  • βœ…Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2014 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    12% HIGHER MSRP
    $279 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 19.8 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 1060 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 81.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 81.9% in PassMark G3D (10,064 vs 5,532), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1060 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 3 GB of VRAM, a 16nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2016 generation instead of 2014. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1060 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $30 cheaper on MSRP at $249 vs $279, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 103.8% (40.4 vs 19.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon R9 280 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

AMD

Radeon R9 280

The Radeon R9 280 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 4 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 933 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,532 points. Launch price was $279.

⚑

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Radeon R9 280's 5,532 β€” the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 81.9%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Radeon R9 280 uses GCN 1.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 280). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 3.344 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 280). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 933 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon R9 280
G3D Mark Score
10,064+82%
5,532
Architecture
Pascal
GCN 1.0
Process Node
16 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2560+43%
1792
Compute (TFLOPS)
8.873 TFLOPS+165%
3.344 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1733 MHz+86%
933 MHz
ROPs
64+100%
32
TMUs
160+43%
112
L1 Cache
960 KB+114%
448 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+167%
0.75 MB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 280 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon R9 280
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
πŸ’Ύ

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 280 carries 3 GB. GeForce GTX 1060 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 240 GB/s (Radeon R9 280) β€” a 25% advantage for the Radeon R9 280. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1060 and 384-bit on the Radeon R9 280. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 0.75 MB (Radeon R9 280) β€” the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon R9 280
VRAM Capacity
6 GB+100%
3 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
192 GB/s
240 GB/s+25%
Bus Width
192-bit
384-bit+100%
L2 Cache
2 MB+167%
0.75 MB
πŸ”Œ

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Radeon R9 280's 200W β€” a 10.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 500W (Radeon R9 280). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon R9 280
TDP
180W-10%
200W
Recommended PSU
400W-20%
500W
Power Connector
6-pin
6-pin + 8-pin
Length
173mm
β€”
Height
111mm
β€”
Slots
2
β€”
Perf/Watt
55.9+102%
27.7
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1060 came in at $249, while the Radeon R9 280 launched at $279. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1060 was 10.8% cheaper ($30 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 19.8 (Radeon R9 280) β€” the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 104% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1060 (2016 vs 2014).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon R9 280
MSRP
$249-11%
$279
Performance per Dollar
40.4+104%
19.8
Codename
GP104
Tahiti
Release
May 27 2016
March 4 2014
Ranking
#137
#415

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.