
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 280X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅+65% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 98.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 20.4 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 3 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Radeon R9 280X
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,100 vs 10,064).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌20.1% HIGHER MSRP$299 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 20.4 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Radeon R9 280X
2013Why buy it
- ✅+65% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 98.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 20.4 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 3 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,100 vs 10,064).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌20.1% HIGHER MSRP$299 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 20.4 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than Radeon R9 280X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 280X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 64 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 15 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 274 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 220 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 183 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 206 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 69 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 33 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Radeon R9 280X

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon R9 280X
Radeon R9 280X
The Radeon R9 280X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,100 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Radeon R9 280X's 6,100 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 65%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Radeon R9 280X uses GCN 1.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 280X). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 4.096 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 280X). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064+65% | 6,100 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+25% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+117% | 4.096 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+73% | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 160+25% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+88% | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+167% | 0.75 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 280X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 280X has 3 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 288 GB/s (Radeon R9 280X) — a 50% advantage for the Radeon R9 280X. Bus width: 192-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 0.75 MB (Radeon R9 280X) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+100% | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 288 GB/s+50% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 384-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+167% | 0.75 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R9 280X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 280X). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Radeon R9 280X).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Radeon R9 280X's 200W — a 10.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 500W (Radeon R9 280X). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-10% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-20% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 173mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9+83% | 30.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 280X launched at $299. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 16.7% less ($50 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 20.4 (Radeon R9 280X) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 98% better value. The GeForce GTX 1060 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-17% | $299 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+98% | 20.4 |
| Codename | GP104 | Tahiti |
| Release | May 27 2016 | October 8 2013 |
| Ranking | #137 | #404 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













