G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

✅16.3% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $1,250 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 593.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 5.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
✅Draws 180W instead of 500W, a 320W reduction.
✅Measures 173mm instead of 307mm, a 134mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.

Radeon R9 295X2

2014

Why buy it

✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
502% HIGHER MSRP
$1,499 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.8 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
❌177.8% higher power demand at 500W vs 180W.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Radeon R9 295X2

2014

Why buy it

✅16.3% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $1,250 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 593.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 5.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
✅Draws 180W instead of 500W, a 320W reduction.
✅Measures 173mm instead of 307mm, a 134mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Why buy it

✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
502% HIGHER MSRP
$1,499 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.8 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
❌177.8% higher power demand at 500W vs 180W.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than Radeon R9 295X2?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1060 is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 16.3% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data and 15.2% higher PassMark G3D performance. It also comes from 2016 instead of 2014, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1060 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2016 generation instead of 2014, 15.2% more raw performance headroom, the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling, and a 16nm process instead of 28nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce GTX 1060 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce GTX 1060 is about $1,250 cheaper on MSRP at $249 MSRP versus $1,499 MSRP, and you are getting 16.3% more estimated average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data and 15.2% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 593.7%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Radeon R9 295X2 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon R9 295X2 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $1,499 MSRP, even if GeForce GTX 1060 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1060 Benchmark Check

Radeon R9 295X2 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon R9 295X2
1080p
low	117 FPS	105 FPS
medium	105 FPS	89 FPS
high	91 FPS	73 FPS
ultra	77 FPS	49 FPS
1440p
low	103 FPS	89 FPS
medium	87 FPS	75 FPS
high	76 FPS	55 FPS
ultra	67 FPS	36 FPS
4K
low	55 FPS	36 FPS
medium	49 FPS	32 FPS
high	41 FPS	20 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	17 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open Radeon R9 295X2

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon R9 295X2
1080p
low	216 FPS	193 FPS
medium	181 FPS	169 FPS
high	148 FPS	141 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	110 FPS
1440p
low	134 FPS	137 FPS
medium	107 FPS	111 FPS
high	87 FPS	88 FPS
ultra	68 FPS	68 FPS
4K
low	62 FPS	63 FPS
medium	51 FPS	53 FPS
high	49 FPS	48 FPS
ultra	41 FPS	39 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open Radeon R9 295X2

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon R9 295X2
1080p
low	453 FPS	393 FPS
medium	362 FPS	314 FPS
high	302 FPS	262 FPS
ultra	226 FPS	197 FPS
1440p
low	340 FPS	295 FPS
medium	272 FPS	236 FPS
high	226 FPS	197 FPS
ultra	170 FPS	147 FPS
4K
low	226 FPS	197 FPS
medium	181 FPS	157 FPS
high	151 FPS	131 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	98 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open Radeon R9 295X2

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon R9 295X2
1080p
low	358 FPS	240 FPS
medium	302 FPS	207 FPS
high	260 FPS	168 FPS
ultra	226 FPS	143 FPS
1440p
low	299 FPS	179 FPS
medium	254 FPS	155 FPS
high	208 FPS	120 FPS
ultra	170 FPS	98 FPS
4K
low	170 FPS	103 FPS
medium	133 FPS	82 FPS
high	123 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	102 FPS	50 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open Radeon R9 295X2

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Radeon R9 295X2

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon R9 295X2

The Radeon R9 295X2 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 29 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1018 MHz. It has 2816 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 500W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,734 points. Launch price was $1,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Radeon R9 295X2's 8,734 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 15.2%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Radeon R9 295X2 uses GCN 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2,816 (Radeon R9 295X2). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 5.733 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon R9 295X2). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1018 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon R9 295X2
G3D Mark Score	10,064+15%	8,734
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 2.0
Process Node	16 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2560	2816 ×2+10%
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.873 TFLOPS+55%	5.733 TFLOPS ×2
Boost Clock	1733 MHz+70%	1018 MHz
ROPs	64	64 ×2
TMUs	160	176 ×2+10%
L1 Cache	960 KB+36%	704 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 295X2 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon R9 295X2
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 295X2 has 8 GB. The Radeon R9 295X2 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 320 GB/s x2 (Radeon R9 295X2) — a 1567.7% advantage for the Radeon R9 295X2. Bus width: 192-bit vs 512-bit x2. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1 MB (Radeon R9 295X2) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon R9 295X2
VRAM Capacity	6 GB	8 GB+33%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	192 GB/s	320 GB/s x2+67%
Bus Width	192-bit	512-bit x2+167%
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 295X2). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon R9 295X2
DirectX	12	12.0
Vulkan	1.3+18%	1.1
OpenGL	4.5+5%	4.3
Max Displays	4	6+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 295X2). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon R9 295X2).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon R9 295X2
Encoder	NVENC (Pascal)	VCE 2.0
Decoder	NVDEC (Pascal)	UVD 4.2
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Radeon R9 295X2's 500W — a 94.1% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1000W (Radeon R9 295X2). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 173mm vs 307mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon R9 295X2
TDP	180W-64%	500W
Recommended PSU	400W-60%	1000W
Power Connector	6-pin	2x 8-pin
Length	173mm	307mm
Height	111mm	114mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	—	65°C
Perf/Watt	55.9+219%	17.5

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 295X2 launched at $1499. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 83.4% less ($1250 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 5.8 (Radeon R9 295X2) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 596.6% better value. The GeForce GTX 1060 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2014).