GeForce GTX 1060
Radeon R9 295X2
GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon R9 295X2 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon R9 295X2 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon R9 295X2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅15.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,250 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 593.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 5.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 500W, a 320W reduction.
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 307mm, a 134mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Radeon R9 295X2
2014Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2014 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌502% HIGHER MSRP$1,499 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.8 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌177.8% higher power demand at 500W vs 180W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon R9 295X2 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.
Radeon R9 295X2
The Radeon R9 295X2 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 29 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1018 MHz. It has 2816 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 500W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,734 points. Launch price was $1,499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Radeon R9 295X2's 8,734 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 15.2%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Radeon R9 295X2 uses GCN 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2,816 (Radeon R9 295X2). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 5.733 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon R9 295X2). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1018 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064+15% | 8,734 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 2816 ×2+10% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+55% | 5.733 TFLOPS ×2 |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+70% | 1018 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 ×2 |
| TMUs | 160 | 176 ×2+10% |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+36% | 704 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 295X2 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 295X2 carries 8 GB. Radeon R9 295X2 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 320 GB/s x2 (Radeon R9 295X2) — a 1567.7% advantage for the Radeon R9 295X2. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1060 and 512-bit x2 on the Radeon R9 295X2. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1 MB (Radeon R9 295X2) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 320 GB/s x2+67% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 512-bit x2+167% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 295X2). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5+5% | 4.3 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 295X2). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon R9 295X2).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Radeon R9 295X2's 500W — a 94.1% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1000W (Radeon R9 295X2). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 173mm vs 307mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-64% | 500W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-60% | 1000W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 173mm | 307mm |
| Height | 111mm | 114mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 65°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9+219% | 17.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 1060 came in at $249, while the Radeon R9 295X2 launched at $1499. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1060 was 83.4% cheaper ($1250 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 5.8 (Radeon R9 295X2) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 596.6% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1060 (2016 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-83% | $1499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+597% | 5.8 |
| Codename | GP104 | Vesuvius |
| Release | May 27 2016 | April 29 2014 |
| Ranking | #137 | #303 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 1060 and Radeon R9 295X2
