
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 370
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅+113.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 27.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 31.7 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon R9 370: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon R9 370 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 221mm, a 48mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌63.6% higher power demand at 180W vs 110W.
Radeon R9 370
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 180W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,722 vs 10,064).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 31.7 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌27.7% longer card at 221mm vs 173mm.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Radeon R9 370
2015Why buy it
- ✅+113.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 27.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 31.7 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon R9 370: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon R9 370 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 221mm, a 48mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 180W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌63.6% higher power demand at 180W vs 110W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,722 vs 10,064).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 31.7 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌27.7% longer card at 221mm vs 173mm.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than Radeon R9 370?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 370 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 370 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 30 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 370 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 41 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 22 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 16 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 9 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 370 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 53 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 370 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 55 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 25 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Radeon R9 370

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon R9 370
Radeon R9 370
The Radeon R9 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 975 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,722 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Radeon R9 370's 4,722 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 113.1%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Radeon R9 370 uses GCN 1.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 370). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2.496 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 370). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 975 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 370 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064+113% | 4,722 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+100% | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+255% | 2.496 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+78% | 975 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 160+100% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+150% | 384 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 370 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 370 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 179 GB/s (Radeon R9 370) — a 7.3% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1060. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 370) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 370 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s+7% | 179 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R9 370). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 370 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 370). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs H.264,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,MVC (Radeon R9 370).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | UVD 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | H.264,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,MVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Radeon R9 370's 110W — a 48.3% difference. The Radeon R9 370 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 450W (Radeon R9 370). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 173mm vs 221mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 370 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 110W-39% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-11% | 450W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 173mm | 221mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9+30% | 42.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 370 launched at $149. The Radeon R9 370 costs 40.2% less ($100 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 31.7 (Radeon R9 370) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 27.4% better value. The GeForce GTX 1060 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 370 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | $149-40% |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+27% | 31.7 |
| Codename | GP104 | Trinidad |
| Release | May 27 2016 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #137 | #456 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













