
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 380
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅+67.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 34.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 30.2 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 220W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Radeon R9 380
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,000 vs 10,064).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 30.2 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌22.2% higher power demand at 220W vs 180W.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Radeon R9 380
2015Why buy it
- ✅+67.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 34.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 30.2 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 220W, a 40W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,000 vs 10,064).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 30.2 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌22.2% higher power demand at 220W vs 180W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than Radeon R9 380?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 380 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 41 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 31 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 52 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 19 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 11 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 180 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 68 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 121 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 102 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 32 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Radeon R9 380

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon R9 380
Radeon R9 380
The Radeon R9 380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 970 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,000 points. Launch price was $199.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Radeon R9 380's 6,000 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 67.7%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Radeon R9 380 uses GCN 3.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 380). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 3.476 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 380). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 970 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064+68% | 6,000 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+43% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+155% | 3.476 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+79% | 970 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 160+43% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+114% | 448 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 380 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 380 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 182.4 GB/s (Radeon R9 380) — a 5.3% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1060. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 380) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s+5% | 182.4 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon R9 380).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | — |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | — |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Radeon R9 380's 220W — a 20% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 500W (Radeon R9 380). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 2x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-18% | 220W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-20% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 173mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9+105% | 27.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 380 launched at $199. The Radeon R9 380 costs 20.1% less ($50 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 30.2 (Radeon R9 380) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 33.8% better value. The GeForce GTX 1060 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 380 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | $199-20% |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+34% | 30.2 |
| Codename | GP104 | Antigua |
| Release | May 27 2016 | June 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #137 | #396 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













