GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon R9 A375

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

2016Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon R9 A375

2015Core: 1015 MHzBoost: 925 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

  • +882.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Delivers 93.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 20.9 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
  • 1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Less risky long-term buy than Radeon R9 A375: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon R9 A375 is already obsolete for modern gaming.

Trade-offs

  • Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
  • 500% higher power demand at 180W vs 30W.
  • 17200% longer card at 173mm vs 1mm.

Radeon R9 A375

2015

Why buy it

  • Costs $200 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
  • Draws 30W instead of 180W, a 150W reduction.
  • Measures 1mm instead of 173mm, a 172mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,024 vs 10,064).
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 20.9 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than Radeon R9 A375?
Yes. GeForce GTX 1060 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 10,064 vs 1,024 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce GTX 1060 is a 2016 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Radeon R9 A375 is a 2015 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1060 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2016 generation instead of 2015, 882.8% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 6 GB instead of 512 MB, and the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
GeForce GTX 1060 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce GTX 1060 is about 408.2% more expensive on MSRP at $249 MSRP versus $49 MSRP, and you are getting 882.8% higher G3D Mark. Radeon R9 A375 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
Is Radeon R9 A375 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
No, not for a fresh gaming build. Radeon R9 A375 is 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM, 1,024 in G3D Mark, and FSR upscaling. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce GTX 1060Radeon R9 A375
1080p
low117 FPS19 FPS
medium105 FPS12 FPS
high91 FPS8 FPS
ultra77 FPS4 FPS
1440p
low103 FPS13 FPS
medium87 FPS7 FPS
high76 FPS3 FPS
ultra67 FPS2 FPS
4K
low55 FPS5 FPS
medium49 FPS3 FPS
high41 FPS1 FPS
ultra37 FPS1 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce GTX 1060Radeon R9 A375
1080p
low216 FPS45 FPS
medium181 FPS23 FPS
high148 FPS17 FPS
ultra113 FPS11 FPS
1440p
low134 FPS20 FPS
medium107 FPS11 FPS
high87 FPS7 FPS
ultra68 FPS5 FPS
4K
low62 FPS6 FPS
medium51 FPS4 FPS
high49 FPS3 FPS
ultra41 FPS2 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce GTX 1060Radeon R9 A375
1080p
low453 FPS46 FPS
medium362 FPS37 FPS
high302 FPS31 FPS
ultra226 FPS23 FPS
1440p
low340 FPS35 FPS
medium272 FPS28 FPS
high226 FPS23 FPS
ultra170 FPS17 FPS
4K
low226 FPS23 FPS
medium181 FPS18 FPS
high151 FPS15 FPS
ultra113 FPS12 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce GTX 1060Radeon R9 A375
1080p
low358 FPS46 FPS
medium302 FPS37 FPS
high260 FPS31 FPS
ultra226 FPS23 FPS
1440p
low299 FPS35 FPS
medium254 FPS28 FPS
high208 FPS23 FPS
ultra170 FPS17 FPS
4K
low170 FPS23 FPS
medium133 FPS18 FPS
high123 FPS15 FPS
ultra102 FPS12 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Radeon R9 A375

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

AMD

Radeon R9 A375

The Radeon R9 A375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1015 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,024 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Radeon R9 A375's 1,024 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 882.8%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Radeon R9 A375 uses GCN 1.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 640 (Radeon R9 A375). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 925 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon R9 A375
G3D Mark Score
10,064+883%
1,024
Architecture
Pascal
GCN 1.0
Process Node
16 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2560+300%
640
Boost Clock
1733 MHz+87%
925 MHz
ROPs
64+300%
16
TMUs
160+300%
40

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 A375 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon R9 A375
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 A375 has 512 MB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 1100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon R9 A375
VRAM Capacity
6 GB+1100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
192 GB/s
Unknown
Bus Width
192-bit+50%
128-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12_0 (Radeon R9 A375). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon R9 A375
DirectX
12
12_0
Max Displays
4
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 A375). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs UVD 4.2.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon R9 A375
Encoder
NVENC (Pascal)
VCE 2.0
Decoder
NVDEC (Pascal)
UVD 4.2
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Radeon R9 A375's 30W — a 142.9% difference. The Radeon R9 A375 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (Radeon R9 A375). Power connectors: 6-pin vs None. Card length: 173mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon R9 A375
TDP
180W
30W-83%
Recommended PSU
400W
350W-13%
Power Connector
6-pin
None
Length
173mm
1mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Perf/Watt
55.9+64%
34.1
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 A375 launched at $49. The Radeon R9 A375 costs 80.3% less ($200 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 20.9 (Radeon R9 A375) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 93.3% better value. The GeForce GTX 1060 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon R9 A375
MSRP
$249
$49-80%
Performance per Dollar
40.4+93%
20.9
Codename
GP104
Venus
Release
May 27 2016
2015
Ranking
#137
#877