GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

2016Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz
GTX family
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X

2015Boost: 1050 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

  • 26.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $400 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
  • Delivers 169.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 15.0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
  • 50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
  • Draws 180W instead of 275W, a 95W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X

2015

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 160.6% HIGHER MSRP
    $649 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 1060 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 26.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.3% in PassMark G3D (10,064 vs 9,741), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1060 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM, a 16nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2016 generation instead of 2015. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1060 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $400 cheaper on MSRP at $249 vs $649, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 169.3% (40.4 vs 15.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

AMD

Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X

The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 24 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,741 points. Launch price was $649.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 and the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X reaches 9,741 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X uses GCN 3.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 4,096 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1050 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
G3D Mark Score
10,064+3%
9,741
Architecture
Pascal
GCN 3.0
Process Node
16 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2560
4096+60%
Compute (TFLOPS)
8.873 TFLOPS+3%
8.602 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1733 MHz+65%
1050 MHz
ROPs
64
64
TMUs
160
256+60%
L1 Cache
0.94 MB
1 MB+6%
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X carries 4 GB. GeForce GTX 1060 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 512 GB/s (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) — a 166.7% advantage for the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1060 and 4096-bit on the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
VRAM Capacity
6 GB+50%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
HBM
Memory Bandwidth
192 GB/s
512 GB/s+167%
Bus Width
192-bit
4096-bit+2033%
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
DirectX
12
12.0
Vulkan
1.3+8%
1.2
OpenGL
4.5+2%
4.4
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
Encoder
NVENC (Pascal)
VCE 3.0
Decoder
NVDEC (Pascal)
UVD 6.0
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X's 275W — a 41.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 600W (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 173mm vs 195mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
TDP
180W-35%
275W
Recommended PSU
400W-33%
600W
Power Connector
6-pin
2x 8-pin
Length
173mm
195mm
Height
111mm
115mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
65°C
Perf/Watt
55.9+58%
35.4
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1060 came in at $249, while the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X launched at $649. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1060 was 61.6% cheaper ($400 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 15.0 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 169.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1060 (2016 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
MSRP
$249-62%
$649
Performance per Dollar
40.4+169%
15.0
Codename
GP104
Fiji
Release
May 27 2016
June 24 2015
Ranking
#137
#282

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.