GeForce GTX 1060
VS
Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X

GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

2016Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X

2015Boost: 1050 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.3% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (6 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X.

InsightGeForce GTX 1060Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
Performance
Leading raw performance (+3.3%)
Lower raw frame rates (-3.3%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+50%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 1060 holds the technical lead. Priced at $60 (vs $80), it costs 25% less, resulting in a 37.8% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce GTX 1060Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+37.8%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($60)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($80)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

AMD

Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X

The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 24 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,741 points. Launch price was $649.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 and the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X reaches 9,741 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X uses GCN 3.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 4,096 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1050 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
G3D Mark Score
10,064+3%
9,741
Architecture
Pascal
GCN 3.0
Process Node
16 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2560
4096+60%
Compute (TFLOPS)
8.873 TFLOPS+3%
8.602 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1733 MHz+65%
1050 MHz
ROPs
64
64
TMUs
160
256+60%
L1 Cache
0.94 MB
1 MB+6%
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 512 GB/s (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) — a 166.7% advantage for the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X. Bus width: 192-bit vs 4096-bit.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
VRAM Capacity
6 GB+50%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
HBM
Memory Bandwidth
192 GB/s
512 GB/s+167%
Bus Width
192-bit
4096-bit+2033%
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
DirectX
12
12.0
Vulkan
1.3+8%
1.2
OpenGL
4.5+2%
4.4
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
Encoder
NVENC (Pascal)
VCE 3.0
Decoder
NVDEC (Pascal)
UVD 6.0
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X's 275W — a 41.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 600W (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 173mm vs 195mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
TDP
180W-35%
275W
Recommended PSU
400W-33%
600W
Power Connector
6-pin
2x 8-pin
Length
173mm
195mm
Height
111mm
115mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
65°C
Perf/Watt
55.9+58%
35.4
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP and currently averages $60, while the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X launched at $649 and now averages $80. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 25% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 167.7 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 121.8 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 37.7% better value. The GeForce GTX 1060 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
MSRP
$249-62%
$649
Avg Price (30d)
$60-25%
$80
Performance per Dollar
167.7+38%
121.8
Codename
GP104
Fiji
Release
May 27 2016
June 24 2015
Ranking
#137
#282