
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 470/570
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅32.2% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 240mm, a 67mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌39.1% HIGHER MSRP$249 MSRPvs$179 MSRP
- ❌50% higher power demand at 180W vs 120W.
Radeon RX 470/570
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $70 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 180W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌38.7% longer card at 240mm vs 173mm.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Radeon RX 470/570
2016Why buy it
- ✅32.2% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 240mm, a 67mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $70 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 180W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌39.1% HIGHER MSRP$249 MSRPvs$179 MSRP
- ❌50% higher power demand at 180W vs 120W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌38.7% longer card at 240mm vs 173mm.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than Radeon RX 470/570?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 470/570 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 17 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 34 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 34 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 15 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 357 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 286 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 238 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 89 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 48 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Radeon RX 470/570

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon RX 470/570
Radeon RX 470/570
The Radeon RX 470/570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 926 MHz to 1206 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,935 points. Launch price was $179.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Radeon RX 470/570's 7,935 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 26.8%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 470/570 uses GCN 4.0, both on 16 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 470/570). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 4.94 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 470/570). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1206 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064+27% | 7,935 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+25% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+80% | 4.94 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+44% | 1206 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 160+25% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+88% | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 470/570 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 470/570 has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 470/570 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 470/570) — a 16.7% advantage for the Radeon RX 470/570. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 224 GB/s+17% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.0 (Radeon RX 470/570). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 470/570). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX 470/570).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Radeon RX 470/570's 120W — a 40% difference. The Radeon RX 470/570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 450W (Radeon RX 470/570). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 6-pin. Card length: 173mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 120W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-11% | 450W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | 6-pin |
| Length | 173mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 66.1+18% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 470/570 launched at $179. The Radeon RX 470/570 costs 28.1% less ($70 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 44.3 (Radeon RX 470/570) — the Radeon RX 470/570 offers 9.7% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | $179-28% |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4 | 44.3+10% |
| Codename | GP104 | Ellesmere |
| Release | May 27 2016 | August 4 2016 |
| Ranking | #137 | #315 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













