
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $130 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 270mm, a 97mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 5700 across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Radeon RX 5700
2019Why buy it
- ✅1.8% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌52.2% HIGHER MSRP$379 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌56.1% longer card at 270mm vs 173mm.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Radeon RX 5700
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $130 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 270mm, a 97mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅1.8% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 5700 across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌52.2% HIGHER MSRP$379 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌56.1% longer card at 270mm vs 173mm.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 5700 better than GeForce GTX 1060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 43 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 220 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 42 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 643 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 515 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 429 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 322 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 482 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 386 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 241 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 322 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 257 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 214 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 161 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 427 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 358 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 255 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 357 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 302 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 237 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 155 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 115 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Radeon RX 5700

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon RX 5700
Radeon RX 5700
The Radeon RX 5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1465 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,296 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Radeon RX 5700's 14,296 — the Radeon RX 5700 leads by 42.1%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 5700 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 5700). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 7.949 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5700). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1725 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064 | 14,296+42% |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+11% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+12% | 7.949 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | 1725 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160+11% | 144 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5700 is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1060 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 5700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5700 has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 5700 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 448 GB/s (Radeon RX 5700) — a 133.3% advantage for the Radeon RX 5700. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX 5700) — the Radeon RX 5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 448 GB/s+133% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.0 (Radeon RX 5700). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5700). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5700).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Radeon RX 5700's 180W — a 0% difference. The Radeon RX 5700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 600W (Radeon RX 5700). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 173mm vs 270mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-33% | 600W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 173mm | 270mm |
| Height | 111mm | 110mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 79.4+42% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 5700 launched at $379. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 34.3% less ($130 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 37.7 (Radeon RX 5700) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 7.2% better value. The Radeon RX 5700 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-34% | $379 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+7% | 37.7 |
| Codename | GP104 | Navi 10 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | July 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #137 | #167 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













