G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

✅+89.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
315% HIGHER MSRP
$249 MSRPvs$60 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 40.4 vs 88.7 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
❌414.3% higher power demand at 180W vs 35W.

Radeon RX 6300

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $189 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
✅Delivers 119.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 88.7 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($60 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 35W instead of 180W, a 145W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,319 vs 10,064).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Radeon RX 6300

2022

Why buy it

✅+89.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).

Why buy it

✅Costs $189 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
✅Delivers 119.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 88.7 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($60 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 35W instead of 180W, a 145W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
315% HIGHER MSRP
$249 MSRPvs$60 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 40.4 vs 88.7 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
❌414.3% higher power demand at 180W vs 35W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,319 vs 10,064).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than Radeon RX 6300?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1060 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 10,064 vs 5,319 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce GTX 1060 is a 2016 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Radeon RX 6300 is a 2022 model from an older generation with FSR 3 + AFMF. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 6300 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2022 generation instead of 2016, better upscaling support with FSR 3 (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 6nm process instead of 16nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce GTX 1060 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce GTX 1060 is about 315.0% more expensive on MSRP at $249 MSRP versus $60 MSRP, and you are getting 89.2% higher G3D Mark. Radeon RX 6300 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

When does Radeon RX 6300 make more sense than GeForce GTX 1060?

Yes. Radeon RX 6300 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (35W vs 180W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $60 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce GTX 1060. The trade-off is that GeForce GTX 1060 currently gives you 89.2% higher G3D Mark. Radeon RX 6300 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1060 Benchmark Check

Radeon RX 6300 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon RX 6300
1080p
low	117 FPS	129 FPS
medium	105 FPS	115 FPS
high	91 FPS	98 FPS
ultra	77 FPS	73 FPS
1440p
low	103 FPS	118 FPS
medium	87 FPS	99 FPS
high	76 FPS	83 FPS
ultra	67 FPS	62 FPS
4K
low	55 FPS	49 FPS
medium	49 FPS	46 FPS
high	41 FPS	34 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	30 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open Radeon RX 6300

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon RX 6300
1080p
low	216 FPS	158 FPS
medium	181 FPS	124 FPS
high	148 FPS	92 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	59 FPS
1440p
low	134 FPS	104 FPS
medium	107 FPS	81 FPS
high	87 FPS	60 FPS
ultra	68 FPS	41 FPS
4K
low	62 FPS	53 FPS
medium	51 FPS	41 FPS
high	49 FPS	32 FPS
ultra	41 FPS	20 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open Radeon RX 6300

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon RX 6300
1080p
low	453 FPS	239 FPS
medium	362 FPS	191 FPS
high	302 FPS	160 FPS
ultra	226 FPS	120 FPS
1440p
low	340 FPS	180 FPS
medium	272 FPS	144 FPS
high	226 FPS	120 FPS
ultra	170 FPS	90 FPS
4K
low	226 FPS	120 FPS
medium	181 FPS	96 FPS
high	151 FPS	80 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	60 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open Radeon RX 6300

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon RX 6300
1080p
low	358 FPS	239 FPS
medium	302 FPS	191 FPS
high	260 FPS	160 FPS
ultra	226 FPS	120 FPS
1440p
low	299 FPS	180 FPS
medium	254 FPS	144 FPS
high	208 FPS	120 FPS
ultra	170 FPS	90 FPS
4K
low	170 FPS	108 FPS
medium	133 FPS	81 FPS
high	123 FPS	70 FPS
ultra	102 FPS	54 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open Radeon RX 6300

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Radeon RX 6300

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon RX 6300

The Radeon RX 6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,319 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Radeon RX 6300's 5,319 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 89.2%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 6300 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 768 (Radeon RX 6300). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 3.686 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6300). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 2400 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon RX 6300
G3D Mark Score	10,064+89%	5,319
Architecture	Pascal	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	16 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	2560+233%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.873 TFLOPS+141%	3.686 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1733 MHz	2400 MHz+38%
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	160+233%	48
L1 Cache	960 KB+275%	256 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6300 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1060 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6300 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon RX 6300
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR 3
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6300 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 64 GB/s (Radeon RX 6300) — a 200% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1060. Bus width: 192-bit vs 32-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6300) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon RX 6300
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+50%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	192 GB/s+200%	64 GB/s
Bus Width	192-bit+500%	32-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12_2 (Radeon RX 6300). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon RX 6300
DirectX	12	12_2
Max Displays	4+100%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6300). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs VCN 3.0.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon RX 6300
Encoder	NVENC (Pascal)	VCN 3.0
Decoder	NVDEC (Pascal)	VCN 3.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Radeon RX 6300's 35W — a 134.9% difference. The Radeon RX 6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 300W (Radeon RX 6300). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 160mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon RX 6300
TDP	180W	35W-81%
Recommended PSU	400W	300W-25%
Power Connector	6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	173mm	160mm
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	1-50%
Perf/Watt	55.9	152.0+172%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 6300 launched at $60. The Radeon RX 6300 costs 75.9% less ($189 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 88.7 (Radeon RX 6300) — the Radeon RX 6300 offers 119.6% better value. The Radeon RX 6300 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2016).