G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

✅+363.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 195.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 13.7 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌260% higher power demand at 180W vs 50W.

Radeon RX 640

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $90 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 1060: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 1060 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
✅Draws 50W instead of 180W, a 130W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,172 vs 10,064).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 13.7 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Radeon RX 640

2019

Why buy it

✅+363.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 195.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 13.7 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).

Why buy it

✅Costs $90 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 1060: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 1060 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
✅Draws 50W instead of 180W, a 130W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌260% higher power demand at 180W vs 50W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,172 vs 10,064).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 13.7 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than Radeon RX 640?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1060 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 10,064 vs 2,172 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce GTX 1060 is a 2016 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Radeon RX 640 is a 2019 model from an older generation with FSR 3 + AFMF. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 640 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2019 generation instead of 2016, better upscaling support with FSR 3 (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 14nm process instead of 16nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce GTX 1060 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce GTX 1060 is about 56.6% more expensive on MSRP at $249 MSRP versus $159 MSRP, and you are getting 363.4% higher G3D Mark. Radeon RX 640 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

When does Radeon RX 640 make more sense than GeForce GTX 1060?

Yes. Radeon RX 640 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (50W vs 180W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $159 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce GTX 1060. The trade-off is that GeForce GTX 1060 currently gives you 363.4% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 195.9%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1060 Benchmark Check

Radeon RX 640 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon RX 640
1080p
low	117 FPS	40 FPS
medium	105 FPS	26 FPS
high	91 FPS	19 FPS
ultra	77 FPS	11 FPS
1440p
low	103 FPS	28 FPS
medium	87 FPS	17 FPS
high	76 FPS	9 FPS
ultra	67 FPS	5 FPS
4K
low	55 FPS	10 FPS
medium	49 FPS	7 FPS
high	41 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	3 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open Radeon RX 640

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon RX 640
1080p
low	216 FPS	77 FPS
medium	181 FPS	48 FPS
high	148 FPS	35 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	21 FPS
1440p
low	134 FPS	35 FPS
medium	107 FPS	26 FPS
high	87 FPS	17 FPS
ultra	68 FPS	11 FPS
4K
low	62 FPS	10 FPS
medium	51 FPS	7 FPS
high	49 FPS	6 FPS
ultra	41 FPS	4 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open Radeon RX 640

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon RX 640
1080p
low	453 FPS	98 FPS
medium	362 FPS	78 FPS
high	302 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	226 FPS	49 FPS
1440p
low	340 FPS	73 FPS
medium	272 FPS	59 FPS
high	226 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	170 FPS	37 FPS
4K
low	226 FPS	49 FPS
medium	181 FPS	39 FPS
high	151 FPS	33 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	24 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open Radeon RX 640

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon RX 640
1080p
low	358 FPS	98 FPS
medium	302 FPS	78 FPS
high	260 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	226 FPS	49 FPS
1440p
low	299 FPS	73 FPS
medium	254 FPS	59 FPS
high	208 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	170 FPS	37 FPS
4K
low	170 FPS	49 FPS
medium	133 FPS	39 FPS
high	123 FPS	33 FPS
ultra	102 FPS	24 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open Radeon RX 640

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Radeon RX 640

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon RX 640

The Radeon RX 640 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,172 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Radeon RX 640's 2,172 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 363.4%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 640 uses GCN 4.0, both on 16 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 640 (Radeon RX 640). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1.559 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 640). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1218 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon RX 640
G3D Mark Score	10,064+363%	2,172
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 4.0
Process Node	16 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	2560+300%	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.873 TFLOPS+469%	1.559 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1733 MHz+42%	1218 MHz
ROPs	64+300%	16
TMUs	160+300%	40
L1 Cache	960 KB+500%	160 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 640 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1060 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 640 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon RX 640
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR 3
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 640 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon RX 640) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon RX 640
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+50%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	192 GB/s	Unknown
Bus Width	192-bit+50%	128-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12 (FL 12_0) (Radeon RX 640). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon RX 640
DirectX	12	12 (FL 12_0)
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.5	4.6+2%
Max Displays	4	6+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 640). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX 640).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon RX 640
Encoder	NVENC (Pascal)	VCE 3.4
Decoder	NVDEC (Pascal)	UVD 6.3
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC	H.264,H.265/HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Radeon RX 640's 50W — a 113% difference. The Radeon RX 640 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (Radeon RX 640). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon RX 640
TDP	180W	50W-72%
Recommended PSU	400W	350W-13%
Power Connector	6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	173mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	1-50%
Perf/Watt	55.9+29%	43.4

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 640 launched at $159. The Radeon RX 640 costs 36.1% less ($90 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 13.7 (Radeon RX 640) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 194.9% better value. The Radeon RX 640 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2016).