
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅+32.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 16nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌140% higher power demand at 180W vs 75W.
Radeon RX 6500
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Unknown architecture on Unknown node with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 180W, a 105W reduction.
- ✅Measures 172mm instead of 173mm, a 1mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,610 vs 10,064).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Radeon RX 6500
Why buy it
- ✅+32.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 16nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Unknown architecture on Unknown node with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 180W, a 105W reduction.
- ✅Measures 172mm instead of 173mm, a 1mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌140% higher power demand at 180W vs 75W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,610 vs 10,064).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than Radeon RX 6500?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 6500 make more sense than GeForce GTX 1060?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 34 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 13 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 299 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 258 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 196 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 160 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 121 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 53 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 29 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Radeon RX 6500

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon RX 6500
Radeon RX 6500
The Radeon RX 6500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in sem dados. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,610 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Radeon RX 6500's 7,610 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 32.2%.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064+32% | 7,610 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6500 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1060 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6500 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6500 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 144 GB/s (Radeon RX 6500) — a 33.3% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1060. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s+33% | 144 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6500). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs None (Radeon RX 6500). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 6500).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | None |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Radeon RX 6500's 75W — a 82.4% difference. The Radeon RX 6500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 400W (Radeon RX 6500). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 173mm vs 172mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 75W-58% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 400W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 173mm | 172mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 101.5+82% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 6500 launched at $199. The Radeon RX 6500 costs 20.1% less ($50 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 38.2 (Radeon RX 6500) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 5.8% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | $199-20% |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+6% | 38.2 |
| Codename | GP104 | — |
| Release | May 27 2016 | sem dados |
| Ranking | #137 | #335 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













