
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6500M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅+35.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌260% higher power demand at 180W vs 50W.
Radeon RX 6500M
2022Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 180W, a 130W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,443 vs 10,064).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Radeon RX 6500M
2022Why buy it
- ✅+35.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 180W, a 130W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌260% higher power demand at 180W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,443 vs 10,064).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than Radeon RX 6500M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 6500M make more sense than GeForce GTX 1060?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 52 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 31 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 47 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 57 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 24 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 335 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 268 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 223 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 167 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 251 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 201 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 126 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 74 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 303 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 233 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 167 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 55 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Radeon RX 6500M

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon RX 6500M
Radeon RX 6500M
The Radeon RX 6500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,443 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Radeon RX 6500M's 7,443 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 35.2%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 6500M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 6500M). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 4.915 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6500M). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 2400 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064+35% | 7,443 |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+150% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+81% | 4.915 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | 2400 MHz+38% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 160+150% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+275% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6500M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1060 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6500M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6500M has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 144 GB/s (Radeon RX 6500M) — a 33.3% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1060. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6500M) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s+33% | 144 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon RX 6500M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6500M). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Radeon RX 6500M).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Radeon RX 6500M's 50W — a 113% difference. The Radeon RX 6500M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (Radeon RX 6500M). Power connectors: 6-pin vs Mobile.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 50W-72% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 350W-13% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 173mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 148.9+166% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 6500M is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 6500M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | — |
| Codename | GP104 | Navi 24 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #137 | #341 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













