G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

✅Costs $130 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
✅Measures 173mm instead of 267mm, a 94mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6700 across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 10 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 40.4 vs 49.9 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).

Radeon RX 6700

2021

Why buy it

✅39.2% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 23.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 49.9 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅66.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (10 GB vs 6 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌54.3% longer card at 267mm vs 173mm.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Radeon RX 6700

2021

Why buy it

✅Costs $130 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
✅Measures 173mm instead of 267mm, a 94mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Why buy it

✅39.2% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 23.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 49.9 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅66.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (10 GB vs 6 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6700 across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 10 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 40.4 vs 49.9 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌54.3% longer card at 267mm vs 173mm.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon RX 6700 better than GeForce GTX 1060?

Yes. Radeon RX 6700 is clearly the better overall GPU here. Radeon RX 6700 averages 39.2% more FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 18,920 vs 10,064 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon RX 6700 is a 2021 card with FSR 3 + AFMF, while GeForce GTX 1060 is a 2016 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 6700 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2021 generation instead of 2016, 88.0% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 10 GB instead of 6 GB, and better upscaling support with FSR 3 (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon RX 6700 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Radeon RX 6700 is about 52.2% more expensive on MSRP at $379 MSRP versus $249 MSRP, and you are getting 39.2% more estimated average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data and 88.0% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 1060 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is GeForce GTX 1060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. GeForce GTX 1060 is 2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM, 10,064 in G3D Mark, and no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1060 Benchmark Check

Radeon RX 6700 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon RX 6700
1080p
low	117 FPS	168 FPS
medium	105 FPS	150 FPS
high	91 FPS	132 FPS
ultra	77 FPS	111 FPS
1440p
low	103 FPS	140 FPS
medium	87 FPS	113 FPS
high	76 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	67 FPS	91 FPS
4K
low	55 FPS	86 FPS
medium	49 FPS	73 FPS
high	41 FPS	59 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	51 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open Radeon RX 6700

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon RX 6700
1080p
low	216 FPS	432 FPS
medium	181 FPS	357 FPS
high	148 FPS	286 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	238 FPS
1440p
low	134 FPS	271 FPS
medium	107 FPS	223 FPS
high	87 FPS	185 FPS
ultra	68 FPS	151 FPS
4K
low	62 FPS	126 FPS
medium	51 FPS	107 FPS
high	49 FPS	87 FPS
ultra	41 FPS	66 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open Radeon RX 6700

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon RX 6700
1080p
low	453 FPS	844 FPS
medium	362 FPS	681 FPS
high	302 FPS	568 FPS
ultra	226 FPS	426 FPS
1440p
low	340 FPS	639 FPS
medium	272 FPS	511 FPS
high	226 FPS	426 FPS
ultra	170 FPS	319 FPS
4K
low	226 FPS	426 FPS
medium	181 FPS	341 FPS
high	151 FPS	284 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	213 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open Radeon RX 6700

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon RX 6700
1080p
low	358 FPS	679 FPS
medium	302 FPS	564 FPS
high	260 FPS	474 FPS
ultra	226 FPS	402 FPS
1440p
low	299 FPS	528 FPS
medium	254 FPS	440 FPS
high	208 FPS	358 FPS
ultra	170 FPS	301 FPS
4K
low	170 FPS	313 FPS
medium	133 FPS	277 FPS
high	123 FPS	250 FPS
ultra	102 FPS	206 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open Radeon RX 6700

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Radeon RX 6700

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon RX 6700

The Radeon RX 6700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1941 MHz to 2450 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18,920 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Radeon RX 6700's 18,920 — the Radeon RX 6700 leads by 88%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 6700 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 6700). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 11.29 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6700). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 2450 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon RX 6700
G3D Mark Score	10,064	18,920+88%
Architecture	Pascal	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	16 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	2560+11%	2304
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.873 TFLOPS	11.29 TFLOPS+27%
Boost Clock	1733 MHz	2450 MHz+41%
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	160+11%	144
L1 Cache	960 KB+88%	512 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB	3 MB+50%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6700 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1060 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon RX 6700
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR 3
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6700 has 10 GB. The Radeon RX 6700 offers 66.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 320 GB/s (Radeon RX 6700) — a 66.7% advantage for the Radeon RX 6700. Bus width: 192-bit vs 160-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 6700) — the Radeon RX 6700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon RX 6700
VRAM Capacity	6 GB	10 GB+67%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	192 GB/s	320 GB/s+67%
Bus Width	192-bit+20%	160-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	3 MB+50%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6700). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon RX 6700
DirectX	12	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.5	4.6+2%
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs VCE (Radeon RX 6700). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs UVD. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (Radeon RX 6700).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon RX 6700
Encoder	NVENC (Pascal)	VCE
Decoder	NVDEC (Pascal)	UVD
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Radeon RX 6700's 175W — a 2.8% difference. The Radeon RX 6700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 550W (Radeon RX 6700). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 173mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon RX 6700
TDP	180W	175W-3%
Recommended PSU	400W-27%	550W
Power Connector	6-pin	8-pin
Length	173mm	267mm
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	—	75°C
Perf/Watt	55.9	108.1+93%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 6700 launched at $379. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 34.3% less ($130 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 49.9 (Radeon RX 6700) — the Radeon RX 6700 offers 23.5% better value. The Radeon RX 6700 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2016).