G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6700M across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 10 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌33.3% higher power demand at 180W vs 135W.

Radeon RX 6700M

2021

Why buy it

✅29.3% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅66.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (10 GB vs 6 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 135W instead of 180W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Radeon RX 6700M

2021

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Why buy it

✅29.3% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅66.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (10 GB vs 6 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 135W instead of 180W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6700M across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 10 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌33.3% higher power demand at 180W vs 135W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon RX 6700M better than GeForce GTX 1060?

Yes. Radeon RX 6700M is clearly the better overall GPU here. Radeon RX 6700M averages 29.3% more FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 13,525 vs 10,064 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon RX 6700M is a 2021 card with FSR 3 + AFMF, while GeForce GTX 1060 is a 2016 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 6700M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2021 generation instead of 2016, 34.4% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 10 GB instead of 6 GB, and better upscaling support with FSR 3 (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon RX 6700M is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Radeon RX 6700M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $249 MSRP, and you are getting 29.3% more estimated average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data and 34.4% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 1060 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is GeForce GTX 1060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. GeForce GTX 1060 is 2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM, 10,064 in G3D Mark, and no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1060 Benchmark Check

Radeon RX 6700M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon RX 6700M
1080p
low	117 FPS	164 FPS
medium	105 FPS	146 FPS
high	91 FPS	127 FPS
ultra	77 FPS	108 FPS
1440p
low	103 FPS	138 FPS
medium	87 FPS	112 FPS
high	76 FPS	98 FPS
ultra	67 FPS	89 FPS
4K
low	55 FPS	84 FPS
medium	49 FPS	70 FPS
high	41 FPS	55 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	48 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open Radeon RX 6700M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon RX 6700M
1080p
low	216 FPS	392 FPS
medium	181 FPS	329 FPS
high	148 FPS	269 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	223 FPS
1440p
low	134 FPS	255 FPS
medium	107 FPS	213 FPS
high	87 FPS	177 FPS
ultra	68 FPS	144 FPS
4K
low	62 FPS	120 FPS
medium	51 FPS	103 FPS
high	49 FPS	83 FPS
ultra	41 FPS	63 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open Radeon RX 6700M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon RX 6700M
1080p
low	453 FPS	609 FPS
medium	362 FPS	487 FPS
high	302 FPS	406 FPS
ultra	226 FPS	304 FPS
1440p
low	340 FPS	456 FPS
medium	272 FPS	365 FPS
high	226 FPS	304 FPS
ultra	170 FPS	228 FPS
4K
low	226 FPS	304 FPS
medium	181 FPS	243 FPS
high	151 FPS	203 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	152 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open Radeon RX 6700M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon RX 6700M
1080p
low	358 FPS	609 FPS
medium	302 FPS	487 FPS
high	260 FPS	406 FPS
ultra	226 FPS	304 FPS
1440p
low	299 FPS	456 FPS
medium	254 FPS	365 FPS
high	208 FPS	304 FPS
ultra	170 FPS	228 FPS
4K
low	170 FPS	291 FPS
medium	133 FPS	243 FPS
high	123 FPS	203 FPS
ultra	102 FPS	152 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open Radeon RX 6700M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Radeon RX 6700M

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon RX 6700M

The Radeon RX 6700M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 31 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1489 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 135W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,525 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Radeon RX 6700M's 13,525 — the Radeon RX 6700M leads by 34.4%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 6700M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 6700M). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 11.06 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6700M). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 2400 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon RX 6700M
G3D Mark Score	10,064	13,525+34%
Architecture	Pascal	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	16 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	2560+11%	2304
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.873 TFLOPS	11.06 TFLOPS+25%
Boost Clock	1733 MHz	2400 MHz+38%
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	160+11%	144
L1 Cache	960 KB+88%	512 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB	3 MB+50%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6700M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1060 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6700M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon RX 6700M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR 3
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6700M has 10 GB. The Radeon RX 6700M offers 66.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 320 GB/s (Radeon RX 6700M) — a 66.7% advantage for the Radeon RX 6700M. Bus width: 192-bit vs 160-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 6700M) — the Radeon RX 6700M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon RX 6700M
VRAM Capacity	6 GB	10 GB+67%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	192 GB/s	320 GB/s+67%
Bus Width	192-bit+20%	160-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	3 MB+50%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6700M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon RX 6700M
DirectX	12	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.5	4.6+2%
Max Displays	4+300%	1

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6700M). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 6700M).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Radeon RX 6700M
Encoder	NVENC (Pascal)	VCN 3.0
Decoder	NVDEC (Pascal)	VCN 3.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Radeon RX 6700M's 135W — a 28.6% difference. The Radeon RX 6700M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 500W (Radeon RX 6700M). Power connectors: 6-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 173mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.