
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6850M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 267mm, a 94mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,064 vs 12,274).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌50% higher power demand at 180W vs 120W.
Radeon RX 6850M
2022Why buy it
- ✅+22% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 180W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌54.3% longer card at 267mm vs 173mm.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Radeon RX 6850M
2022Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 267mm, a 94mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅+22% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 180W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,064 vs 12,274).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌50% higher power demand at 180W vs 120W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌54.3% longer card at 267mm vs 173mm.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 6850M better than GeForce GTX 1060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 6850M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 50 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 6850M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 317 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 267 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 209 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 165 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 57 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 6850M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 552 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 442 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 368 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 276 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 414 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 331 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 207 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 184 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 138 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 6850M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 487 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 397 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 333 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 276 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 313 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 249 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 202 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 126 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Radeon RX 6850M

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon RX 6850M
Radeon RX 6850M
The Radeon RX 6850M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2068 MHz to 2416 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,274 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Radeon RX 6850M's 12,274 — the Radeon RX 6850M leads by 22%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 6850M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 6850M). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 8.659 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6850M). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 2416 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 6850M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064 | 12,274+22% |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+43% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+2% | 8.659 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | 2416 MHz+39% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160+43% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+88% | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6850M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1060 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6850M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 6850M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6850M has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 6850M offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 432 GB/s (Radeon RX 6850M) — a 125% advantage for the Radeon RX 6850M. Bus width: 192-bit vs 192-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 6850M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 432 GB/s+125% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6850M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 6850M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6850M). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 6850M).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 6850M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Radeon RX 6850M's 120W — a 40% difference. The Radeon RX 6850M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 500W (Radeon RX 6850M). Power connectors: 6-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 173mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 6850M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 120W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-20% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 173mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 102.3+83% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 6850M is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 6850M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | — |
| Codename | GP104 | Navi 23 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #137 | #148 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













