
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7900M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7900M across 38 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Radeon RX 7900M
2023Why buy it
- ✅104.6% more average FPS across 38 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Radeon RX 7900M
2023Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅104.6% more average FPS across 38 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7900M across 38 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 7900M better than GeForce GTX 1060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 223 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 182 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 166 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 86 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 576 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 480 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 368 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 314 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 393 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 326 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 257 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 209 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 194 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 113 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 938 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 769 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 672 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 504 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 709 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 583 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 504 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 378 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 495 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 252 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 765 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 653 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 588 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 504 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 640 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 549 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 480 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 378 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 435 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 379 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 252 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Radeon RX 7900M

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon RX 7900M
Radeon RX 7900M
The Radeon RX 7900M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 19 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2090 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,385 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Radeon RX 7900M's 22,385 — the Radeon RX 7900M leads by 122.4%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 7900M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 16 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 4,608 (Radeon RX 7900M). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 38.52 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7900M). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 2090 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064 | 22,385+122% |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 4608+80% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS | 38.52 TFLOPS+334% |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | 2090 MHz+21% |
| ROPs | 64 | 192+200% |
| TMUs | 160 | 288+80% |
| L1 Cache | 0.94 MB | 3 MB+219% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7900M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1060 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 7900M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7900M has 16 GB. The Radeon RX 7900M offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 576 GB/s (Radeon RX 7900M) — a 200% advantage for the Radeon RX 7900M. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 6 MB (Radeon RX 7900M) — the Radeon RX 7900M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 16 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 576 GB/s+200% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7900M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7900M). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7900M).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Radeon RX 7900M's 180W — a 0% difference. The Radeon RX 7900M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 330W (Radeon RX 7900M). Power connectors: 6-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 173mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 330W-18% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 173mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 124.4+123% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 7900M is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | — |
| Codename | GP104 | Navi 31 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | October 19 2023 |
| Ranking | #137 | #62 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













