GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon RX Vega 56

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

2016Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz
GTX family
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon RX Vega 56

2017Core: 1156 MHzBoost: 1471 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon RX Vega 56 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon RX Vega 56 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon RX Vega 56: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

  • Costs $150 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
  • Delivers 23.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 32.6 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
  • Draws 180W instead of 210W, a 30W reduction.
  • Measures 173mm instead of 280mm, a 107mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon RX Vega 56 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Radeon RX Vega 56

2017

Why buy it

  • 9.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
  • GeForce GTX 1060 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Radeon RX Vega 56 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 60.2% HIGHER MSRP
    $399 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 32.6 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
  • 16.7% higher power demand at 210W vs 180W.
  • 61.8% longer card at 280mm vs 173mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon RX Vega 56 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 9.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 29.4% in PassMark G3D (13,026 vs 10,064), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon RX Vega 56 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 6 GB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 14nm process instead of 16nm, and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2016. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1060 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $150 cheaper on MSRP at $249 vs $399, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 23.8% (40.4 vs 32.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 1060 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and lighter 1440p headroom, Radeon RX Vega 56 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon RX Vega 56 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

AMD

Radeon RX Vega 56

The Radeon RX Vega 56 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 14 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1156 MHz to 1471 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,026 points. Launch price was $399.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Radeon RX Vega 56's 13,026 — the Radeon RX Vega 56 leads by 29.4%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX Vega 56 uses GCN 5.0, both on 16 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 3,584 (Radeon RX Vega 56). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 10.54 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega 56). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1471 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon RX Vega 56
G3D Mark Score
10,064
13,026+29%
Architecture
Pascal
GCN 5.0
Process Node
16 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
2560
3584+40%
Compute (TFLOPS)
8.873 TFLOPS
10.54 TFLOPS+19%
Boost Clock
1733 MHz+18%
1471 MHz
ROPs
64
64
TMUs
160
224+40%
L1 Cache
960 KB+7%
896 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
4 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX Vega 56 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon RX Vega 56
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega 56 carries 8 GB. Radeon RX Vega 56 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 410 GB/s (Radeon RX Vega 56) — a 113.5% advantage for the Radeon RX Vega 56. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1060 and 2048-bit on the Radeon RX Vega 56. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX Vega 56) — the Radeon RX Vega 56 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon RX Vega 56
VRAM Capacity
6 GB
8 GB+33%
Memory Type
GDDR5
HBM2
Memory Bandwidth
192 GB/s
410 GB/s+114%
Bus Width
192-bit
2048-bit+967%
L2 Cache
2 MB
4 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon RX Vega 56). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon RX Vega 56
DirectX
12
12 (12_1)
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.5
4.6+2%
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon RX Vega 56). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega 56).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon RX Vega 56
Encoder
NVENC (Pascal)
VCE 4.0
Decoder
NVDEC (Pascal)
UVD 7.0
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC
H.264,H.265,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Radeon RX Vega 56's 210W — a 15.4% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 650W (Radeon RX Vega 56). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 173mm vs 280mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon RX Vega 56
TDP
180W-14%
210W
Recommended PSU
400W-38%
650W
Power Connector
6-pin
2x 8-pin
Length
173mm
280mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
75
Perf/Watt
55.9
62.0+11%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1060 came in at $249, while the Radeon RX Vega 56 launched at $399. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1060 was 37.6% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 32.6 (Radeon RX Vega 56) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 23.9% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX Vega 56 (2017 vs 2016).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon RX Vega 56
MSRP
$249-38%
$399
Performance per Dollar
40.4+24%
32.6
Codename
GP104
Vega 10
Release
May 27 2016
August 14 2017
Ranking
#137
#199

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.