
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

Radeon TM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅+80.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1100% higher power demand at 180W vs 15W.
Radeon TM
2024Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 180W, a 165W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,564 vs 10,064).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Radeon TM
2024Why buy it
- ✅+80.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 180W, a 165W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1100% higher power demand at 180W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,564 vs 10,064).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than Radeon TM?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon TM make more sense than GeForce GTX 1060?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 30 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 17 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 15 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 60 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 33 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Radeon TM

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon TM
Radeon TM
The Radeon TM is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,564 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Radeon TM's 5,564 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 80.9%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Radeon TM uses RDNA 3.5, both on 16 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1,024 (Radeon TM). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 5.939 TFLOPS (Radeon TM). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 2900 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064+81% | 5,564 |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 3.5 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+150% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+49% | 5.939 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | 2900 MHz+67% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 160+150% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+275% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon TM relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon TM has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Radeon TM's 15W — a 169.2% difference. The Radeon TM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (Radeon TM). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 15W-92% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 350W-13% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 370.9+564% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon TM is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon TM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | — |
| Codename | GP104 | Strix Point |
| Release | May 27 2016 | July 15 2024 |
| Ranking | #137 | #312 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













