GeForce GTX 1060 vs RadeonT 780M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

✅+41.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌1100% higher power demand at 180W vs 15W.

RadeonT 780M

2024

Why buy it

✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 15W instead of 180W, a 165W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,098 vs 10,064).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

RadeonT 780M

2024

Why buy it

✅+41.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).

Why buy it

✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 15W instead of 180W, a 165W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌1100% higher power demand at 180W vs 15W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,098 vs 10,064).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than RadeonT 780M?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1060 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 10,064 vs 7,098 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce GTX 1060 is a 2016 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while RadeonT 780M is a 2024 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

RadeonT 780M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2016, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 4nm process instead of 16nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce GTX 1060 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce GTX 1060 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $249 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 41.8% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. RadeonT 780M is the newer 2024 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (15W vs 180W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does RadeonT 780M make more sense than GeForce GTX 1060?

Yes. RadeonT 780M is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (15W vs 180W), future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce GTX 1060. The trade-off is that GeForce GTX 1060 currently gives you 41.8% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1060 Benchmark Check

RadeonT 780M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	RadeonT 780M
1080p
low	117 FPS	93 FPS
medium	105 FPS	78 FPS
high	91 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	77 FPS	43 FPS
1440p
low	103 FPS	80 FPS
medium	87 FPS	68 FPS
high	76 FPS	51 FPS
ultra	67 FPS	32 FPS
4K
low	55 FPS	29 FPS
medium	49 FPS	27 FPS
high	41 FPS	18 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	16 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open RadeonT 780M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	RadeonT 780M
1080p
low	216 FPS	98 FPS
medium	181 FPS	68 FPS
high	148 FPS	48 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	33 FPS
1440p
low	134 FPS	67 FPS
medium	107 FPS	45 FPS
high	87 FPS	33 FPS
ultra	68 FPS	24 FPS
4K
low	62 FPS	35 FPS
medium	51 FPS	25 FPS
high	49 FPS	19 FPS
ultra	41 FPS	13 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open RadeonT 780M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	RadeonT 780M
1080p
low	453 FPS	319 FPS
medium	362 FPS	256 FPS
high	302 FPS	213 FPS
ultra	226 FPS	160 FPS
1440p
low	340 FPS	240 FPS
medium	272 FPS	192 FPS
high	226 FPS	160 FPS
ultra	170 FPS	120 FPS
4K
low	226 FPS	159 FPS
medium	181 FPS	128 FPS
high	151 FPS	104 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	77 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open RadeonT 780M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1060	RadeonT 780M
1080p
low	358 FPS	214 FPS
medium	302 FPS	171 FPS
high	260 FPS	146 FPS
ultra	226 FPS	108 FPS
1440p
low	299 FPS	142 FPS
medium	254 FPS	117 FPS
high	208 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	170 FPS	75 FPS
4K
low	170 FPS	83 FPS
medium	133 FPS	67 FPS
high	123 FPS	54 FPS
ultra	102 FPS	38 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1060 Open RadeonT 780M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and RadeonT 780M

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

RadeonT 780M

The RadeonT 780M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,098 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the RadeonT 780M's 7,098 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 41.8%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the RadeonT 780M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 16 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 768 (RadeonT 780M). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 8.909 TFLOPS (RadeonT 780M). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 2900 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	RadeonT 780M
G3D Mark Score	10,064+42%	7,098
Architecture	Pascal	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	16 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	2560+233%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.873 TFLOPS	8.909 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1733 MHz	2900 MHz+67%
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	160+233%	48
L1 Cache	960 KB+275%	256 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The RadeonT 780M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	RadeonT 780M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the RadeonT 780M has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	RadeonT 780M
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+50%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	192-bit+50%	128-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.2 (RadeonT 780M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	RadeonT 780M
DirectX	12	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.5	4.6+2%
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs VCN 4.0 (RadeonT 780M). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RadeonT 780M).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	RadeonT 780M
Encoder	NVENC (Pascal)	VCN 4.0
Decoder	NVDEC (Pascal)	VCN 4.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the RadeonT 780M's 15W — a 169.2% difference. The RadeonT 780M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (RadeonT 780M). Power connectors: 6-pin vs None. Card length: 173mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.