
GeForce GTX 1060

RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
GeForce GTX 1060 vs RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1060 vs RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 1060 vs RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅2.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,064 vs 11,162).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌414.3% higher power demand at 180W vs 35W.
RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
2024Why buy it
- ✅+10.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 180W, a 145W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1060 vs RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 26 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 2025 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,162 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile's 11,162 — the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile leads by 10.9%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile uses Ada Lovelace, both on 16 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2,048 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 8.294 TFLOPS (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 2025 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064 | 11,162+11% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+25% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+7% | 8.294 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | 2025 MHz+17% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 160+150% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 0.94 MB | 2 MB+113% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 12 MB+500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce GTX 1060 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1060 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 4 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 4) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile carries 8 GB. RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 128 GB/s (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) — a 50% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1060. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1060 and 64-bit on the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12 MB (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) — the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s+50% | 128 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 12 MB+500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12 (12_2) (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile's 35W — a 134.9% difference. The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 500W (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 35W-81% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-20% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 318.9+470% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile (2024 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | — |
| Codename | GP104 | AD107 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | February 26 2024 |
| Ranking | #137 | #254 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















