
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

RTX 5000 Ada Generation
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,751 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $4,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 434.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 7.6 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $4,000 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 250W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 267mm, a 94mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 5000 Ada Generation across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
2023Why buy it
- ✅120.0% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅433.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌1506.4% HIGHER MSRP$4,000 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.6 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($4,000 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌38.9% higher power demand at 250W vs 180W.
- ❌54.3% longer card at 267mm vs 173mm.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016RTX 5000 Ada Generation
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,751 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $4,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 434.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 7.6 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $4,000 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 250W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 267mm, a 94mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅120.0% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅433.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 5000 Ada Generation across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌1506.4% HIGHER MSRP$4,000 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.6 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($4,000 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌38.9% higher power demand at 250W vs 180W.
- ❌54.3% longer card at 267mm vs 173mm.
Quick Answers
So, is RTX 5000 Ada Generation better than GeForce GTX 1060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 224 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 196 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 117 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 53 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 583 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 482 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 374 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 324 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 491 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 411 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 328 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 269 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 287 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 186 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 911 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 748 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 674 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 581 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 709 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 580 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 511 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 435 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 487 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 350 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 289 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 401 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 350 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 306 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 258 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 291 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 260 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 224 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 188 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 101 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and RTX 5000 Ada Generation

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1155 MHz to 2550 MHz. It has 12800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 100 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30,269 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the RTX 5000 Ada Generation's 30,269 — the RTX 5000 Ada Generation leads by 200.8%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the RTX 5000 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on 16 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12,800 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 65.28 TFLOPS (RTX 5000 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 2550 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064 | 30,269+201% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 12800+400% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS | 65.28 TFLOPS+636% |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | 2550 MHz+47% |
| ROPs | 64 | 176+175% |
| TMUs | 160 | 400+150% |
| L1 Cache | 0.94 MB | 12.5 MB+1230% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 72 MB+3500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the RTX 5000 Ada Generation is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1060 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX 5000 Ada Generation supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1060 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 4 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 4) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 5000 Ada Generation has 32 GB. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation offers 433.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 576 GB/s (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) — a 200% advantage for the RTX 5000 Ada Generation. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 72 MB (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) — the RTX 5000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 32 GB+433% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 ECC |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 576 GB/s+200% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 72 MB+3500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12 Ultimate (RTX 5000 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (RTX 5000 Ada Generation). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | NVENC (8th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the RTX 5000 Ada Generation's 250W — a 32.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 650W (RTX 5000 Ada Generation). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 16-pin. Card length: 173mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-28% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-38% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | 16-pin |
| Length | 173mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 121.1+117% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the RTX 5000 Ada Generation launched at $4000. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 93.8% less ($3751 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 7.6 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 431.6% better value. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX 5000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-94% | $4000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+432% | 7.6 |
| Codename | GP104 | AD102 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | August 9 2023 |
| Ranking | #137 | #16 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













