G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs RTX 6000 Ada Generation FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs RTX 6000 Ada Generation: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

✅Costs $6,550 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $6,799 MSRP).
✅Delivers 865.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 4.2 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $6,799 MSRP).
✅Draws 180W instead of 300W, a 120W reduction.
✅Measures 173mm instead of 267mm, a 94mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RTX 6000 Ada Generation across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

RTX 6000 Ada Generation

2022

Why buy it

✅126.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 6 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌
2630.5% HIGHER MSRP
$6,799 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.2 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($6,799 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
❌66.7% higher power demand at 300W vs 180W.
❌54.3% longer card at 267mm vs 173mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RTX 6000 Ada Generation is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 126.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 182.7% in PassMark G3D (28,454 vs 10,064), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RTX 6000 Ada Generation is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 48 GB vs 6 GB of VRAM, a 5nm process instead of 16nm, 142 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2016. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1060 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $6,550 cheaper on MSRP at $249 vs $6,799, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 865.8% (40.4 vs 4.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 1060 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1440p and 4K headroom, RTX 6000 Ada Generation has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs RTX 6000 Ada Generation Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

RTX 6000 Ada Generation

The RTX 6000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 3 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 2505 MHz. It has 18176 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 142 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,454 points. Launch price was $6,799.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the RTX 6000 Ada Generation's 28,454 — the RTX 6000 Ada Generation leads by 182.7%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the RTX 6000 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on 16 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 18,176 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 91.06 TFLOPS (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 2505 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	RTX 6000 Ada Generation
G3D Mark Score	10,064	28,454+183%
Architecture	Pascal	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	16 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	2560	18176+610%
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.873 TFLOPS	91.06 TFLOPS+926%
Boost Clock	1733 MHz	2505 MHz+45%
ROPs	64	192+200%
TMUs	160	568+255%
L1 Cache	0.94 MB	17.8 MB+1794%
L2 Cache	2 MB	96 MB+4700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	RTX 6000 Ada Generation
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 6000 Ada Generation carries 48 GB. RTX 6000 Ada Generation gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 960 GB/s (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) — a 400% advantage for the RTX 6000 Ada Generation. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1060 and 384-bit on the RTX 6000 Ada Generation. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 96 MB (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) — the RTX 6000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	RTX 6000 Ada Generation
VRAM Capacity	6 GB	48 GB+700%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	192 GB/s	960 GB/s+400%
Bus Width	192-bit	384-bit+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB	96 MB+4700%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.2 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	RTX 6000 Ada Generation
DirectX	12	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.5	4.6+2%
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs NVENC 8th Gen (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	RTX 6000 Ada Generation
Encoder	NVENC (Pascal)	NVENC 8th Gen
Decoder	NVDEC (Pascal)	NVDEC 5th Gen
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC	AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the RTX 6000 Ada Generation's 300W — a 50% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 500W (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 16-pin. Card length: 173mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	RTX 6000 Ada Generation
TDP	180W-40%	300W
Recommended PSU	400W-20%	500W
Power Connector	6-pin	16-pin
Length	173mm	267mm
Height	111mm	112mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	—	80°C
Perf/Watt	55.9	94.8+70%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1060 came in at $249, while the RTX 6000 Ada Generation launched at $6799. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1060 was 96.3% cheaper ($6550 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 4.2 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 861.9% better value. The newer card here is RTX 6000 Ada Generation (2022 vs 2016).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	RTX 6000 Ada Generation
MSRP	$249-96%	$6799
Performance per Dollar	40.4+862%	4.2
Codename	GP104	AD102
Release	May 27 2016	December 3 2022
Ranking	#137	#24

Search GeForce GTX 1060 on Amazon

Search RTX 6000 Ada Generation on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.