GeForce GTX 1060 vs RTX A1000

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

2016Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

RTX A1000

2024Core: 727 MHzBoost: 1462 MHz

GeForce GTX 1060 vs RTX A1000 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs RTX A1000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs RTX A1000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

  • 17.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $500 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $749 MSRP).
  • Delivers 179.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 14.4 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $749 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 260% higher power demand at 180W vs 50W.

RTX A1000

2024

Why buy it

  • 33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
  • Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 50W instead of 180W, a 130W reduction.
  • Measures 163mm instead of 173mm, a 10mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 200.8% HIGHER MSRP
    $749 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.4 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($749 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 1060 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 17.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward RTX A1000 instead at 10,814 vs 10,064, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
RTX A1000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 6 GB of VRAM, a 8nm process instead of 16nm, 18 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2016. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1060 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $500 cheaper on MSRP at $249 vs $749, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 179.9% (40.4 vs 14.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 1060 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, RTX A1000 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs RTX A1000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

NVIDIA

RTX A1000

The RTX A1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 727 MHz to 1462 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,814 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the RTX A1000's 10,814 — the RTX A1000 leads by 7.5%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the RTX A1000 uses Ampere, both on 16 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2,304 (RTX A1000). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 6.737 TFLOPS (RTX A1000). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1462 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060RTX A1000
G3D Mark Score
10,064
10,814+7%
Architecture
Pascal
Ampere
Process Node
16 nm
8 nm
Shading Units
2560+11%
2304
Compute (TFLOPS)
8.873 TFLOPS+32%
6.737 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1733 MHz+19%
1462 MHz
ROPs
64+100%
32
TMUs
160+122%
72
L1 Cache
0.94 MB
2.3 MB+145%
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060RTX A1000
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A1000 carries 8 GB. RTX A1000 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1060 and 128-bit on the RTX A1000.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060RTX A1000
VRAM Capacity
6 GB
8 GB+33%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
192-bit+50%
128-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.2 (RTX A1000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060RTX A1000
DirectX
12
12.2+2%
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.5
4.6+2%
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A1000). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A1000).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060RTX A1000
Encoder
NVENC (Pascal)
7th Gen NVENC
Decoder
NVDEC (Pascal)
5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the RTX A1000's 50W — a 113% difference. The RTX A1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 500W (RTX A1000). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 163mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060RTX A1000
TDP
180W
50W-72%
Recommended PSU
400W-20%
500W
Power Connector
6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
173mm
163mm
Height
111mm
69mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
55.9
216.3+287%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1060 came in at $249, while the RTX A1000 launched at $749. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1060 was 66.8% cheaper ($500 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 14.4 (RTX A1000) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 180.6% better value. The newer card here is RTX A1000 (2024 vs 2016).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060RTX A1000
MSRP
$249-67%
$749
Performance per Dollar
40.4+181%
14.4
Codename
GP104
GA107
Release
May 27 2016
April 16 2024
Ranking
#137
#251

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.