
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅31.2% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,064 vs 11,009).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌414.3% higher power demand at 180W vs 35W.
- ❌111% longer card at 173mm vs 82mm.
RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
2022Why buy it
- ✅+9.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 180W, a 145W reduction.
- ✅Measures 82mm instead of 173mm, a 91mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1060
2016RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
2022Why buy it
- ✅31.2% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅+9.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 180W, a 145W reduction.
- ✅Measures 82mm instead of 173mm, a 91mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,064 vs 11,009).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌414.3% higher power demand at 180W vs 35W.
- ❌111% longer card at 173mm vs 82mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is RTX A1000 Embedded GPU better than GeForce GTX 1060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 49 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 17 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 97 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 53 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 34 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 24 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 495 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 396 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 330 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 248 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 372 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 297 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 248 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 120 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 127 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 48 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and RTX A1000 Embedded GPU

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
The RTX A1000 Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 630 MHz to 1140 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,009 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the RTX A1000 Embedded GPU's 11,009 — the RTX A1000 Embedded GPU leads by 9.4%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the RTX A1000 Embedded GPU uses Ampere, both on 16 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2,048 (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 4.669 TFLOPS (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1140 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064 | 11,009+9% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ampere |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+25% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+90% | 4.669 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+52% | 1140 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 160+150% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 0.94 MB | 2 MB+113% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A1000 Embedded GPU has 8 GB. The RTX A1000 Embedded GPU offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.2 (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the RTX A1000 Embedded GPU's 35W — a 134.9% difference. The RTX A1000 Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 500W (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 82mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 35W-81% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-20% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | 82mm |
| Height | 111mm | 4mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 314.5+463% |
Value Analysis
The RTX A1000 Embedded GPU is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A1000 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | — |
| Codename | GP104 | GA107S |
| Release | May 27 2016 | March 30 2022 |
| Ranking | #137 | #246 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













