
GeForce GTX 1060

RTX A2000
GeForce GTX 1060 vs RTX A2000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1060 vs RTX A2000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 1060 vs RTX A2000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $201 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 35.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 29.9 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A2000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌157.1% higher power demand at 180W vs 70W.
RTX A2000
2021Why buy it
- ✅1.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 180W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 173mm, a 6mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌80.7% HIGHER MSRP$450 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 29.9 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1060 vs RTX A2000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

RTX A2000
The RTX A2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 10 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 562 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 3328 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 26 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,464 points. Launch price was $449.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the RTX A2000's 13,464 — the RTX A2000 leads by 33.8%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the RTX A2000 uses Ampere, both on 16 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 3,328 (RTX A2000). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 7.987 TFLOPS (RTX A2000). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1200 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064 | 13,464+34% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ampere |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 3328+30% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+11% | 7.987 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+44% | 1200 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 160+54% | 104 |
| L1 Cache | 0.94 MB | 3.3 MB+251% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A2000 carries 8 GB. RTX A2000 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1060 and 128-bit on the RTX A2000. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 3 MB (RTX A2000) — the RTX A2000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.2 (RTX A2000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the RTX A2000's 70W — a 88% difference. The RTX A2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 500W (RTX A2000). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 70W-61% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-20% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | 167mm |
| Height | 111mm | 68mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 192.3+244% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 1060 came in at $249, while the RTX A2000 launched at $450. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1060 was 44.7% cheaper ($201 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 29.9 (RTX A2000) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 35.1% better value. The newer card here is RTX A2000 (2021 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-45% | $450 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+35% | 29.9 |
| Codename | GP104 | GA106 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | August 10 2021 |
| Ranking | #137 | #186 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















