
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

RTX A2000 12GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 32.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 30.6 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A2000 12GB across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌157.1% higher power demand at 180W vs 70W.
RTX A2000 12GB
2021Why buy it
- ✅0.6% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 180W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 173mm, a 6mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌80.3% HIGHER MSRP$449 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 30.6 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1060
2016RTX A2000 12GB
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 32.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 30.6 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅0.6% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 180W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 173mm, a 6mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A2000 12GB across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌157.1% higher power demand at 180W vs 70W.
Trade-offs
- ❌80.3% HIGHER MSRP$449 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 30.6 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is RTX A2000 12GB better than GeForce GTX 1060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 18 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 60 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 34 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 617 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 494 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 412 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 309 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 361 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 306 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 232 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 309 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 147 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 212 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 56 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and RTX A2000 12GB

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

RTX A2000 12GB
RTX A2000 12GB
The RTX A2000 12GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 23 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 562 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 3328 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 26 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,721 points. Launch price was $449.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the RTX A2000 12GB's 13,721 — the RTX A2000 12GB leads by 36.3%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the RTX A2000 12GB uses Ampere, both on 16 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 3,328 (RTX A2000 12GB). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 7.987 TFLOPS (RTX A2000 12GB). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1200 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064 | 13,721+36% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ampere |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 3328+30% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+11% | 7.987 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+44% | 1200 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 160+54% | 104 |
| L1 Cache | 0.94 MB | 3.3 MB+251% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A2000 12GB has 8 GB. The RTX A2000 12GB offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 3 MB (RTX A2000 12GB) — the RTX A2000 12GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.2 (RTX A2000 12GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000 12GB). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000 12GB).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the RTX A2000 12GB's 70W — a 88% difference. The RTX A2000 12GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 500W (RTX A2000 12GB). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 70W-61% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-20% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | 167mm |
| Height | 111mm | 68mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 196.0+251% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the RTX A2000 12GB launched at $449. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 44.5% less ($200 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 30.6 (RTX A2000 12GB) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 32% better value. The RTX A2000 12GB is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-45% | $449 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+32% | 30.6 |
| Codename | GP104 | GA106 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | November 23 2021 |
| Ranking | #137 | #177 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













