
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

RTX A2000 Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌89.5% higher power demand at 180W vs 95W.
RTX A2000 Mobile
2021Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 180W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1060
2016RTX A2000 Mobile
2021Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 180W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌89.5% higher power demand at 180W vs 95W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than RTX A2000 Mobile?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does RTX A2000 Mobile make more sense than GeForce GTX 1060?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A2000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 47 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 31 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 17 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A2000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 240 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 202 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 124 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 51 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A2000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 342 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 285 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 214 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 321 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 257 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 214 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 160 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 214 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 107 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A2000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 37 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and RTX A2000 Mobile

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

RTX A2000 Mobile
RTX A2000 Mobile
The RTX A2000 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1215 MHz to 1687 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,506 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the RTX A2000 Mobile's 9,506 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 5.9%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the RTX A2000 Mobile uses Ampere, both on 16 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2,560 (RTX A2000 Mobile). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 8.637 TFLOPS (RTX A2000 Mobile). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1687 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A2000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064+6% | 9,506 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ampere |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+3% | 8.637 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+3% | 1687 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 160+100% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 0.94 MB | 2.5 MB+166% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A2000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A2000 Mobile has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A2000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.2 (RTX A2000 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A2000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000 Mobile). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000 Mobile).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A2000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the RTX A2000 Mobile's 95W — a 61.8% difference. The RTX A2000 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 500W (RTX A2000 Mobile). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A2000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 95W-47% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-20% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 100.1+79% |
Value Analysis
The RTX A2000 Mobile is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A2000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | — |
| Codename | GP104 | GA107 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #137 | #273 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













