
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

RTX A4000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $862 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $1,111 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 130.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 17.5 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $1,111 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 241mm, a 68mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A4000 across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 180W vs 140W.
RTX A4000
2021Why buy it
- ✅60.4% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 140W instead of 180W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌346.2% HIGHER MSRP$1,111 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.5 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($1,111 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌39.3% longer card at 241mm vs 173mm.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016RTX A4000
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $862 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $1,111 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 130.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 17.5 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $1,111 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 241mm, a 68mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅60.4% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 140W instead of 180W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A4000 across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 180W vs 140W.
Trade-offs
- ❌346.2% HIGHER MSRP$1,111 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.5 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($1,111 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌39.3% longer card at 241mm vs 173mm.
Quick Answers
So, is RTX A4000 better than GeForce GTX 1060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 219 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 182 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 158 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 95 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 53 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 873 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 701 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 584 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 438 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 657 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 526 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 438 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 328 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 438 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 350 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 292 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 219 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 282 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 73 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and RTX A4000

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

RTX A4000
RTX A4000
The RTX A4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,463 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the RTX A4000's 19,463 — the RTX A4000 leads by 93.4%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the RTX A4000 uses Ampere, both on 16 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 6,144 (RTX A4000). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX A4000). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1560 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064 | 19,463+93% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ampere |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 6144+140% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS | 19.17 TFLOPS+116% |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+11% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 160 | 192+20% |
| L1 Cache | 0.94 MB | 6 MB+538% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A4000 has 16 GB. The RTX A4000 offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 448 GB/s (RTX A4000) — a 133.3% advantage for the RTX A4000. Bus width: 192-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 4 MB (RTX A4000) — the RTX A4000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 16 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 448 GB/s+133% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.2 (RTX A4000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A4000). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A4000).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the RTX A4000's 140W — a 25% difference. The RTX A4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 650W (RTX A4000). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 140W-22% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-38% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 139.0+149% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the RTX A4000 launched at $1111. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 77.6% less ($862 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 17.5 (RTX A4000) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 130.9% better value. The RTX A4000 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-78% | $1111 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+131% | 17.5 |
| Codename | GP104 | GA104 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #137 | #85 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













