
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

RTX A4000H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $751 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 242.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 11.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 241mm, a 68mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,064 vs 11,815).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 180W vs 140W.
RTX A4000H
2021Why buy it
- ✅+17.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 140W instead of 180W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌301.6% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌39.3% longer card at 241mm vs 173mm.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016RTX A4000H
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $751 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 242.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 11.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 241mm, a 68mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅+17.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 140W instead of 180W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,064 vs 11,815).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 180W vs 140W.
Trade-offs
- ❌301.6% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌39.3% longer card at 241mm vs 173mm.
Quick Answers
So, is RTX A4000H better than GeForce GTX 1060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 165 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 52 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 27 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 226 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 162 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 191 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 95 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 51 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 532 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 425 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 354 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 266 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 399 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 319 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 199 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 133 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 350 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 257 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 205 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 235 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 154 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 85 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and RTX A4000H

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

RTX A4000H
RTX A4000H
The RTX A4000H is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,815 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the RTX A4000H's 11,815 — the RTX A4000H leads by 17.4%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the RTX A4000H uses Ampere, both on 16 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 6,144 (RTX A4000H). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX A4000H). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1560 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064 | 11,815+17% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ampere |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 6144+140% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS | 19.17 TFLOPS+116% |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+11% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 160 | 192+20% |
| L1 Cache | 0.94 MB | 6 MB+538% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A4000H has 8 GB. The RTX A4000H offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 448 GB/s (RTX A4000H) — a 133.3% advantage for the RTX A4000H. Bus width: 192-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 4 MB (RTX A4000H) — the RTX A4000H has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 448 GB/s+133% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.2 (RTX A4000H). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs None (RTX A4000H). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs None. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs None (RTX A4000H).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | None |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | None |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | None |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the RTX A4000H's 140W — a 25% difference. The RTX A4000H is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 500W (RTX A4000H). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 140W-22% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-20% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 84.4+51% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the RTX A4000H launched at $1000. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 75.1% less ($751 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 11.8 (RTX A4000H) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 242.4% better value. The RTX A4000H is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-75% | $1000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+242% | 11.8 |
| Codename | GP104 | GA104 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #137 | #226 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













