
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

RTX A5500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,351 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $3,600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 589.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 5.9 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $3,600 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 230W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 267mm, a 94mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A5500 across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
RTX A5500
2022Why buy it
- ✅96.9% more average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌1345.8% HIGHER MSRP$3,600 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.9 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($3,600 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌27.8% higher power demand at 230W vs 180W.
- ❌54.3% longer card at 267mm vs 173mm.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016RTX A5500
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,351 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $3,600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 589.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 5.9 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $3,600 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 230W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 267mm, a 94mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅96.9% more average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A5500 across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌1345.8% HIGHER MSRP$3,600 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.9 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($3,600 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌27.8% higher power demand at 230W vs 180W.
- ❌54.3% longer card at 267mm vs 173mm.
Quick Answers
So, is RTX A5500 better than GeForce GTX 1060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 48 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 524 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 458 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 358 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 314 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 409 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 270 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 226 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 124 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 894 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 726 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 631 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 475 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 700 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 564 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 475 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 356 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 475 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 380 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 317 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 237 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 354 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 316 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 278 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 238 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 95 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and RTX A5500

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

RTX A5500
RTX A5500
The RTX A5500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1080 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 10240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 21,108 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the RTX A5500's 21,108 — the RTX A5500 leads by 109.7%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the RTX A5500 uses Ampere, both on 16 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 10,240 (RTX A5500). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 34.1 TFLOPS (RTX A5500). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1665 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064 | 21,108+110% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ampere |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 10240+300% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS | 34.1 TFLOPS+284% |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+4% | 1665 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 160 | 320+100% |
| L1 Cache | 0.94 MB | 10 MB+964% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A5500 has 24 GB. The RTX A5500 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 768 GB/s (RTX A5500) — a 300% advantage for the RTX A5500. Bus width: 192-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 6 MB (RTX A5500) — the RTX A5500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 24 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 768 GB/s+300% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 384-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.1 (RTX A5500). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 7th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX A5500). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A5500).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | 7th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the RTX A5500's 230W — a 24.4% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 450W (RTX A5500). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 173mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-22% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-11% | 450W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 173mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 91.8+64% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the RTX A5500 launched at $3600. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 93.1% less ($3351 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 5.9 (RTX A5500) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 584.7% better value. The RTX A5500 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A5500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-93% | $3600 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+585% | 5.9 |
| Codename | GP104 | GA102 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | March 22 2022 |
| Ranking | #137 | #67 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













