
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

RTX A6000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $4,400 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $4,649 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 723.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 4.9 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $4,649 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 230W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 267mm, a 94mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A6000 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
RTX A6000
2021Why buy it
- ✅97.4% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌1767.1% HIGHER MSRP$4,649 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.9 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($4,649 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌27.8% higher power demand at 230W vs 180W.
- ❌54.3% longer card at 267mm vs 173mm.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016RTX A6000
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $4,400 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $4,649 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 723.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 4.9 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $4,649 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 230W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 267mm, a 94mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅97.4% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A6000 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌1767.1% HIGHER MSRP$4,649 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.9 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($4,649 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌27.8% higher power demand at 230W vs 180W.
- ❌54.3% longer card at 267mm vs 173mm.
Quick Answers
So, is RTX A6000 better than GeForce GTX 1060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 178 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 157 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 42 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 504 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 438 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 296 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 375 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 312 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 242 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 204 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 163 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 113 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 893 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 726 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 631 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 513 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 700 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 564 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 480 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 385 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 480 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 391 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 327 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 257 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 307 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 268 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 223 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 196 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 238 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 153 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 81 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and RTX A6000

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

RTX A6000
RTX A6000
The RTX A6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1170 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 8192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,815 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the RTX A6000's 22,815 — the RTX A6000 leads by 126.7%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the RTX A6000 uses Ampere, both on 16 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 8,192 (RTX A6000). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 27.77 TFLOPS (RTX A6000). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1695 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064 | 22,815+127% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ampere |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 8192+220% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS | 27.77 TFLOPS+213% |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+2% | 1695 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 160 | 256+60% |
| L1 Cache | 0.94 MB | 8 MB+751% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A6000 has 48 GB. The RTX A6000 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 768 GB/s (RTX A6000) — a 300% advantage for the RTX A6000. Bus width: 192-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 6 MB (RTX A6000) — the RTX A6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 48 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 768 GB/s+300% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 384-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 6 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.1 (RTX A6000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 7th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX A6000). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A6000).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | 7th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the RTX A6000's 230W — a 24.4% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 500W (RTX A6000). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 8-pin EPS. Card length: 173mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-22% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-20% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | 8-pin EPS |
| Length | 173mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 99.2+77% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the RTX A6000 launched at $4649. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 94.6% less ($4400 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 4.9 (RTX A6000) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 724.5% better value. The RTX A6000 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-95% | $4649 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+724% | 4.9 |
| Codename | GP104 | GA102 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #137 | #53 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













